Class 11th

Get insights from 8k questions on Class 11th, answered by students, alumni, and experts. You may also ask and answer any question you like about Class 11th

Follow Ask Question
8k

Questions

0

Discussions

28

Active Users

0

Followers

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 4 Views

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

A r e a = 1 2 ( 5 1 ) 9 5 4 1 5 1 2 5 x 2 d x

= 1 8 ( 1 4 + 1 0 5 ) 1 2 c o s 1 1 5 0 ( s i n 2 θ ) d θ

A = 1 4 8 + 5 4 5 ( 5 4 c o s 1 1 5 1 2 )

= 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 c o s 1 1 5

α = 5 4 , β = 5 4 , γ = 5 4

| α + β + γ | = 5 4

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 2 Views

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

R 1 R 1 R 2 , R 2 R 2 R 3

Δ = | a c + 1 b c a b b d 1 c d b c x b + d x + d x + c |

C 1 C 1 C 2 & C 2 C 2 C 3

Δ = | a + 1 b 2 b c a a b b 1 c 2 c b d b c b d c x + c | = | λ + 1 0 λ λ 1 0 λ b λ x + c | , R 1 R 1 R 2

= | 2 0 0 λ 1 0 λ b λ x + c | = 2 λ 2 = 2 λ 2 = 1

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 3 Views

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

0 = -16 m + c . (i)

| m ( 1 0 ) + C | m 2 + 1 = 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( i i )

(i) & (ii) Þ 36 m2 = 4 (m2 + 1)

m = 1 2 2 , C = 8 2

4 2 ( m + c ) = 3 4

 

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 3 Views

S
Syed Aquib Ur Rahman

Contributor-Level 10

Aristotle's main flaw was that he did not account for forces already present that keep a body at rest or in motion. In classical antiquity physics, during this philosopher's time, invisible and opposing forces, such as friction and air resistance, were not understood. So, it was natural to resort to observation-based answers that would later get disproved by scientists like Galileo and Newton, who introduced rigorous experimentation and mathematical enquiries.

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 1 View

S
Syed Aquib Ur Rahman

Contributor-Level 10

Aristotle viewed that a moving body/object would have something external to keep it in motion. Otherwise, that body would stop, as it is the natural state of any object to stay at rest. It was a natural view and a common practical experience for everyone. 

What Aristotle didn't take into consideration was that there are already opposing forces in the natural world, such as friction. A force like friction remains as a net external force in the real world. 

In reality, as we speak, a moving object keeps moving unless something like friction or air slows it down. It's also just like a still object stays still if nothing pushes or

...more

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 5 Views

A
alok kumar singh

Contributor-Level 10

Hydrogen peroxide reduces iodine to iodide ion is basic medium as;

H 2 O 2 + 2 O H + l 2 O 2 + 2 l + 2 H 2 O

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 2 Views

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

0 = 16 m + c . (i)

  | m ( ? 1 0 ) + C | m 2 + 1 = 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( i i )

(i) & (ii) 36 m2 = 4 (m2 + 1)

m = 1 2 2 , C = 8 2

4 2 ( m + c ) = 3 4

New question posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 2 Views

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 2 Views

S
Syed Aquib Ur Rahman

Contributor-Level 10

Yes, all objects have inertia. It does not depend on whether they are moving or not. Inertia is an object's inherent resistance to any change in its state of motion.

For an object at rest, its inertia is its tendency to remain at rest. A force is required to overcome this inertia and set the object in motion. 

The amount of inertia an object has is determined by its mass. The more massive an object is, the more it resists a change in its state of motion. We can also say that this heavier object has greater inertia.

New answer posted

5 months ago

0 Follower 1 View

S
Syed Aquib Ur Rahman

Contributor-Level 10

The law of inertia, also known as Newton's first law of motion, states that an object at rest will stay at rest. Likewise, an object in motion will remain in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless there is a net external force. 

Now in both ideal states, the net external force on an object is zero.

From the perspective of classical mechanics, there isn't a significant distinction between rest and uniform motion. They can be seen as the same state of motion viewed from different reference frames. An object is considered to be in a state of equilibrium whether it is at rest or in uniform motion.

Get authentic answers from experts, students and alumni that you won't find anywhere else

Sign Up on Shiksha

On Shiksha, get access to

  • 66k Colleges
  • 1.2k Exams
  • 681k Reviews
  • 1800k Answers

Share Your College Life Experience

×
×

This website uses Cookies and related technologies for the site to function correctly and securely, improve & personalise your browsing experience, analyse traffic, and support our marketing efforts and serve the Core Purpose. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.