Class 11th

Get insights from 8k questions on Class 11th, answered by students, alumni, and experts. You may also ask and answer any question you like about Class 11th

Follow Ask Question
8k

Questions

0

Discussions

38

Active Users

0

Followers

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 5 Views

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

( 0,3 )

r ? c m = 1 * i ˆ 2 + j ˆ + 1 * i ˆ + 5 j ˆ 2 2 r ? c m = 3 4 i ˆ + 7 4 j ˆ

( 0,0 )

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 5 Views

A
alok kumar singh

Contributor-Level 10

W equator   = W pole   - m ω 2 R

= 196 - 19.6 * 2 π 24 * 60 * 60 2 * 6400 * 10 3 = 195.33 N

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 1 View

S
Syed Aquib Ur Rahman

Contributor-Level 10

Through Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, it's proven that you can't pin down where an electron is and how fast it's moving at the same time. The Bohr model did not look into this. The main reason for that thought was that it pictured electrons like little planets that would move in a loop around the nucleus. But that only works if you know both position and speed exactly. Nature doesn't let you do that. Add to it the fact that electrons also behave like waves, and the Bohr model just couldn't keep up. That's why scientists had to move on to the quantum model, which fits way better with how electrons actually act.

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 1 View

S
Syed Aquib Ur Rahman

Contributor-Level 10

De Broglie had the idea that everything that moves has a bit of wave behaviour.  Technically, that includes any person, a football, and even a bus.  The catch is that for big things, the mass is so large that their wavelength is insanely tiny. It's so tiny it's impossible to notice. That's why you don't see a football spreading out like ripples when you kick it. Electrons though? They're super light, so their wavelengths are big enough for us to actually measure. And when scientists did experiments, such as electron diffraction, the electrons really did behave like waves. That was the proof De Broglie needed to show he was ri

...more

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 1 View

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

Kindly consider the following Image

 

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 1 View

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

m ? 2 ( l + x ) = k x

l x + 1 = k m ? 2 x = l m ? 2 k - m ? 2

 

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 3 Views

A
alok kumar singh

Contributor-Level 10

W = Q 1 - Q 2 = Q 2 - Q 3

Q 2 = Q 1 + Q 3 2

2 = Q 1 Q 2 + Q 3 Q 2

2 = T 1 T + T 2 T

T = T 1 + T 2 2

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 9 Views

R
Raj Pandey

Contributor-Level 9

Kindly consider the following Image

 

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 2 Views

A
alok kumar singh

Contributor-Level 10

Moment of inertia of ring

d l = d m r 2

I = 0 a ? ( A + B r ) 2 π r d r π r 2

= 2 π A 0 a ? r 3 d r + 2 π B 0 a ? r 4 d r

= 2 π A a 4 4 + B a 5 5

= 2 π a 4 A 4 + B a 5

 

New answer posted

2 months ago

0 Follower 2 Views

A
alok kumar singh

Contributor-Level 10

  f 1 = f o v v - v s f 1 - f 2 = 2

f 2 = f o v v + v s f 0 v v + v s - v - v s v 2 - v s 2 = 2 ; 2 f 0 v v s v 2 - v s 2 = 2

? v s ? v v s = 1 4 m / s

Get authentic answers from experts, students and alumni that you won't find anywhere else

Sign Up on Shiksha

On Shiksha, get access to

  • 65k Colleges
  • 1.2k Exams
  • 679k Reviews
  • 1800k Answers

Share Your College Life Experience

×
×

This website uses Cookies and related technologies for the site to function correctly and securely, improve & personalise your browsing experience, analyse traffic, and support our marketing efforts and serve the Core Purpose. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.