Maths
Get insights from 6.5k questions on Maths, answered by students, alumni, and experts. You may also ask and answer any question you like about Maths
Follow Ask QuestionQuestions
Discussions
Active Users
Followers
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
114. Solution :
It is given that f: [-5,5]? R is a differentiable function.
Since every differentiable function is a continuous function, we obtain
(a) f is continuous on [?5, 5].
(b) f is differentiable on (?5, 5).
Therefore, by the Mean Value Theorem, there exists c? (?5, 5) such that
It is also given that f' (x) does not vanish anywhere.
Hence, proved.
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
2. 
By binomial theorem,
(a + b)n = nC0 (a)n (b)0 + nC1 (a)n–1 (b)1 + …………. + nCr (a)n–r (b)r + …………… + nCn (a)n–n (b)n
Where, b0 = 1 = an–n
So, (a + b)n = nCr (a)n–r (b)r
Putting a = 1 and b = 3 such that a + b = 4, we can rewrite the above equation as
(1 + 3)n = nCr (1)n–r.3r
=>4n = .nCr
Hence proved.
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
The given D.E. is
Hence, the D.E. is homogenous
Let, so that, is the D.E.
Thus,
Integrating both sides,

New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
The Given D.E. is
Hence, the given D.E. is homogenous.
Let, in the D.E
Integrating both sides we get,

Putting back we get,
is the required solution.
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
The Given D.E. is
Hence, the given D.E. is homogenous.
Let, in the D.E
Then,
Integrating both sides,
Putting back
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
113. Solution:
By Rolle's Theorem, for a function if
f is continuous on
f is differentiable on
f(a)= f(b)
then, there exists some such that
therefore, Rolle's Theorem is not applicable to those functions that do not satisfy any of the three conditions of the hypothesis.
for
It is evident that the given function f(x) is not continuous at every integral point.
In particular, f(x) is not continuous at x=5 and x=9
f(x) is not continuous in
Also,
The differentiability of f in is checked as follows.
Let n be an integer such that .
The left hand limit of f at x
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
1. For a number x to be divisible by y, we can write x as a factor of y i.e., x = ky where k is some natural number. Thus in order for 9n+1 – 8n – 9 to be divisible by 64 we need to show that 9n+1 – 8n – 9 = 64k where k is some natural number.
We have, by binomial theorem
(1 + a)m = mC0 + mC1 (a) + mC2 (a)2 + mC3 (a)3 + ………… + mCm (a)m
Putting, a = 8 and m = n + 1
(1 + 8)n+1 = n+1C0 + n+1C1.8 + n+1C2.82 + n+1C3.83 + ……. + n+1Cn+1. (8)n+1
=> 9n+1= 1 + (n + 1)8 + 82* [n+1C2 + n+1C3.8 + ………. + n+1Cn+1. (8)n+1–2] [since, n+1C0 = 1, n+1C1= n + 1]
=> 9n+1 = 1 + 8n + 8 + 64 * [n+1C2 + n+1C3.8 + ……
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
The given D.E. is
Hence, the given D.E is homogenous.
Let,
So, the D.E. becomes
Integrating both sides,
Putting back we get,
New answer posted
6 months agoContributor-Level 10
112. Given, , being polynomial function is continuous in and also differentiable in .
Therefore,
The value of at -4 and 2 coincides.
Rolle's Theorem states that there is a point such that
Therefore,
Hence,
Thus,
Hence, Rolle's Theorem is verified.
Taking an Exam? Selecting a College?
Get authentic answers from experts, students and alumni that you won't find anywhere else
Sign Up on ShikshaOn Shiksha, get access to
- 65k Colleges
- 1.2k Exams
- 679k Reviews
- 1800k Answers




