Class 11th

Aristotle's main flaw was that he did not account for forces already present that keep a body at rest or in motion. In classical antiquity physics, during this philosopher's time, invisible and opposing forces, such as friction and air resistance, were not understood. So, it was natural to resort to observation-based answers that would later get disproved by scientists like Galileo and Newton, who introduced rigorous experimentation and mathematical enquiries.

Hydrogen peroxide reduces iodine to iodide ion is basic medium as;

$H_2{O}_2+2O{H}^{-}+l_2\to O_2+2l^{-}+2H_{2}O$

0 = 16 m + c . (i)

 $\frac{\left|m\left(?10\right)+C\right|}{\sqrt[]{m^2+1}}=2.............\left(ii\right)$

(i) & (ii) 36 m2 = 4 (m2 + 1)

$m=\frac{1}{2\sqrt[]{2}},C=\frac{8}{\sqrt[]{2}}$

$4\sqrt[]{2}\left(m+c\right)=34$

Yes, all objects have inertia. It does not depend on whether they are moving or not. Inertia is an object's inherent resistance to any change in its state of motion.

For an object at rest, its inertia is its tendency to remain at rest. A force is required to overcome this inertia and set the object in motion. 

The amount of inertia an object has is determined by its mass. The more massive an object is, the more it resists a change in its state of motion. We can also say that this heavier object has greater inertia.

The law of inertia, also known as Newton's first law of motion, states that an object at rest will stay at rest. Likewise, an object in motion will remain in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless there is a net external force. 

Now in both ideal states, the net external force on an object is zero.

From the perspective of classical mechanics, there isn't a significant distinction between rest and uniform motion. They can be seen as the same state of motion viewed from different reference frames. An object is considered to be in a state of equilibrium whether it is at rest or in uniform motion.

All given oxide have nitrogen – nitrogen bond except N₂O₅ as ;