Law

Hi,
Both the law colleges that you mentioned are good but if you ask for the better one my suggestion would be D.Y. Patil School of law over Siddharth Law College.
This is because D.Y Patil School of Law has a very good campus with a very good faculty and also the academic activities conducted at this law school are said to be better than that in Siddharth Law college.
D.Y. Patil also has a very well maintained library with a very good number of books which prove to be very helpful for the students.
On the other hand, Siddharth Law College has a less rating as compared to D.Y Patil Law College.
Moreover D.Y. Patil Law College has been rated well for best private law colleges in Maharashtra as well as in India.
So on these points, I would go with D.Y Patil School of Law over Siddharth Law college which is also good college.
Hope this information helps you.
Feel free to revert for any queries, information or details regarding the same.
All the very best!

Hey,
I think more than the scope, the interest of individual matters for success in a particular area of law. Let's say, for example, I am interested in tax law but I pursue family law after my law school. I would not be working with that zeal or enthusiasm as compared to tax law. Therefore, according to me, the interest mattes more than the scope as you can make money under any area of law and practice.
But coming to the question, most of the areas of law are interlinked. What has the better scope? I think both of these are too diverse fields and have a lot of subject matters within. Taxation law is governed by a legislation but there are several legislations for matters related to family law. It is very difficult to come to a conclusion as to what area of law has a wider scope. I would go with taxation law but. With regular changes in taxation regime and new structure coming into place, I think it has better scope.

Hi,
I think more than the scope, the interest of individual matters for success in a particular area of law. Let's say, for example, I am interested in international trade law but I pursue banking law after my law school. I would not be working with that zeal or enthusiasm as compared to international trade law. Therefore, according to me, the interest mattes more than the scope as you can make money under any area of law and practice.
But coming to the question, most of the areas of law are interlinked. What has the better scope? I think both of these are too diverse fields and have a lot of subject matters within. We have several legislations that govern aspects related to banking and same is the case with international trade law which is not governed by one legislation. With increasing globalization and market knowing no boundaries as well as increased inter-country and inter-continental trade, international trade law has more scope than banking law.

Hi,
I think more than the scope, the interest of individual matters for success in a particular area of law. Let's say, for example, I am interested in information technology law but I pursue consumer law after my law school. I would not be working with that zeal or enthusiasm as compared to IT law. Therefore, according to me, the interest mattes more than the scope as you can make money under any area of law and practice.
But coming to the question, most of the areas of law are interlinked. Which one has a better scope? I think both of these are too diverse fields and have a lot of subject matters within. Both information technology and consumer law are governed by specific legislation. But surely, in the era of information technology I think information technology law has better scope in the future. It is because of the fact that with growing technology, the offenses and penalties would be increased and would surely be one of the most interesting areas of law.

Hey.
I think more than the scope, the interest of an individual matter for success in a particular area of law. Let's say, for example, I am interested in Taxation Law but I I pursue criminal law after my law school. I would not be working with that zeal or enthusiasm as compared to taxation law. Therefore, according to me, the interest mattes more than the scope as you can make money under any area of law and practice.
But coming to the question, most of the areas of law are interlinked. Let's say, avoiding taxes or not disclosing proper income would be a criminal offense. So, apart from the knowledge of tax law, you would also need to know fundamentals of criminal law in order to help out your client. There are several law firms which specialize in either of these. So, if you are not looking for independent practice, you can join these. But the scope of criminal law is generally wider than tax law considering each area of law has some intersection with the criminal law in some form or the other.

The syllabus of BHU UET Syllabus/ Topics are mentioned below:
- SectionDuration
- General Awareness
- General Mental Ability
- Numerical Ability
- Comprehension
- Subject awareness with subjects
Exam Pattern:
Exam Mode - Offline (Pen/Pencil-Paper based test)
Test Paper Sets - Three
Test level - 10+2 standard level
Exam Duration - 120 Minutes
Total questions - 150 questions
Type of questions - Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
Total Marks - 450 marks
Other Modalities - There will be two sets of multiple choice questions on Language comprehension. The sets will be available in two languages - English and Hindi and candidate can answer either of the set but not both
An entrance exam is conducted separately for both the faculties.Its one of easiest exams. In the faculty of arts, there are 120 questions which are compulsory for everyone. You have to choose either English or Hindi to answer in section B which consists 30 questions. So that makes it 150.
+3 marks for a correct answer and -1 for a wrong one. 0 for an unattempted one. It is an overall 450 marks paper.
Questions are easy except that bio section which has usually 20 - 25 ques. One who has not studied bio in 10+2 would find it very difficult. The score of 15/60 is very good. But even if you leave that section thoroughly still you could top the exam.
Around 25 questions are asked from mental ability, logical reasoning and elementary mathematics Level of these questions remain very ordinary and a little practice could make you able to score 100%. Avoid overconfidence.
25 to 30 questions are from history (mainly history of India). Questions are straightforward and factual in nature. Go through higher secondary level books of history. Even if you remember 20% of what you have studied, a score of over 80% is very achievable. A little interest in history and you have qualified the exam. Very scoring section.
Questions from geography and constitution along with economics have a weight of anything between 20 to 25. Knowledge of 10th level would be sufficient or you can just go through any good book of GK like Lucent or Chronicle.
Rest of the paper consists questions from current affairs, latest sports events, general science etc. This is the pattern for faculty of arts.
Faculty of social sciences follows a bit different pattern. Their questions are divided in history, economics, political science and geography. Questions are a bit harder than that of arts. Now, I am not going to repeat all that of arts.