Urban Designing and town Planning

Hi,
We would like to inform you that UPES-Dehradun is offering M.Plan in urban planning and our course work towards sustainable, equitable and orderly development. The current tools to implement these ideas are master plans, regional developments plans, city development plans, etc. Graduate will be expert in preparing the above and would contribute to development through facilitating better access to land and housing, infrastructure services and employment opportunities in urban and regional space. The target is to educate and train students with interdisciplinary knowledge and skills and ability to work from local to the regional level. Urban and regional planning will offers studios in land use planning ranging from metropolitan region to city level up till ward level plans.
Career prospects:
The programs are broadly based, with a strong vocational focus and graduates enter a wide range of planning related careers in the public, private and non-governmental sectors. Our graduates will be found working in all parts of the India and also worldwide in what is becoming an increasingly globally orientated profession. Many can be found in senior positions in central and local government, private practice and academic institutions. You can expect a hands-on approach to your studies working on projects with public and private organizations providing you with the skills you need to practice planning after graduation. Our ITPI-approved programs ensure that you are fully qualified to enter this dynamic profession. Prospective employers:
Development Authorities & Departments
Public Bodies
National NGOs & Multinational NGOs
International Funding Agencies
Development Banks
Consulting Agencies

Hi, At the expense of sounding biased, I think its pretty exciting to be a part of the urban planning, both its practice and its study as a discipline. I am an engineer by training and my graduate education in planning has incredibly expanded my worldview. On the theoretical side, the reconciliation of post-structuralist (post-modern) tradition within planning has been contentious and the concern, I think, hasn't yet subsided. How does the discipline, as a modernist project, conform to the demands of contingency, fluidity, polyvocality advanced by the post-structuralist movement, is the main question in the discipline.nTo put it simply, the demands placed by the 'real world' (ground-up participation, collaboration, adaptive governance, diversity in policy and plan making, salience of projects while maintaining plurality in process and outcomes etc.). Are pretty complex (note: not complicated) for them to be comprehended within a discipline designed to be reductionist in nature (segregation of planning departments, roles and responsibilities, capital-centric-evaluation tools like benefits-cost analysis etc., ).nHow can the top-down governance structure inject participative models of engagement? How can spatial and temporal dependencies evident in real world outcomes of policies and plans give way to a more adaptive approach? This dovetails into the practical side of planning. Issues like climate change, resource depletion challenges, environmental degradation, loss of biodiversity, ecological challenge and loss of ecosystem services etc., are extremely important issues that gain amplified focus in planning, simply because it is here that man and his environment become the main thesis, the main challenge or object of the discipline.given these theoretical and practical aspects, planning evolution is rife, in meanings ascribed as to what the discipline should be about and what roles should planners assume. One can stay current by considering how major planning associations (APA, ACSP etc.). Shape the discourse and what comes off their position on aforementioned questions. How do major planning consultancies in US and in European countries approach the discipline in their work (is it stuck in neoliberal ideologies or conducive for other traditions like communicative and new urbanist projects).note: Admittedly, my attempt in answering this question has been from a generalist theoretical perspective. All the best.

Hello,
The scope is only formed by the candidate. Out of the given two fields, wherever your interest lies scope is there. To have more insights, you need to first understand about both of these streams:
(#) Commercial Architecture: It involves planning, design and construction management of commercial and retail facilities which require attention of functionality, flexibility and costs. These days, it becomes slightly difficult to expand the horizons of commercial architecture. Local authorities commonly maintain strict regulations on commercial zoning and have the authority to designate any zoned area as such. A business must be located in a commercial area, or area zoned at least partially for commerce.
(#) Urban Planning: This leads you to more sophisticated path. Jobs where your degree would be useful include: civil service administrator, community development worker, environmental manager, landscape architecture, planning and development surveys, and (or) sustainability consultant.