Work, Energy and Power

Get insights from 175 questions on Work, Energy and Power, answered by students, alumni, and experts. You may also ask and answer any question you like about Work, Energy and Power

  • 175

    Questions

  • 0

    Discussions

  • 0

    Active Users

  • 5

    Followers

Have a question about Work, Energy and Power? Ask our experts

Ask Your Question

Keep it short & simple. Type complete word. Avoid abusive language.

New answer posted•a year ago
S
a year ago

Using conservation of energy between initial and final position shown :

[12 (25ma2) (V0a)2+12mV02]+0=mglsinθ

⇒710mV02=mglsinθ

⇒l=7v0210gsinθ

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
S
a year ago

At central point on screen, path difference is zero for all wavelength. So, central bright fringe is white and other fringes depend on wavelength as β = λ D d .

Therefore, other fringes will be coloured.

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
S
a year ago

By work energy theorem

Work done = change in K.E.

Work done by friction work done by spring

= 0 − 1 2 m V 2              

As 90% of K.E. is losed by friction so that

− 9 0 1 0 0 ( 1 2 m V 2 ) − 1 2 K x 2 = − 1 2 m V 2                

-K -> -16 × 105

K = 16 × 105

...Read more

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
S

Formula for Power = F·v cos θ

According to the question, force is perpendicular.

So θ = 90

and cos 90 = 0

Hence, the result turns out to be 0 i.e. no power generated inspite of force being applied.

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
S

In simple words,

Energy = total work done on an object.

Power = how fast the work is done on an object.

For example: Writing an article vs how fast you write the article. This sums up the exact meaning of both these terms.

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
S

No. Even if the power is higher, the energy can be inefficient. This happens when much of the energy generated gets wasted or isn't utilized as effectively as it should have been. In such cases, high power can still lead to inefficiency of energy.

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
S
a year ago

Let m = 250 g = 0.25 kg

By Reduced mass method

mr=m1m2m1+m2=mmm+m=m2

By wet

wSP=ΔK.E.

−12kx2=0−12 (m2) (2v)2

22x2=0.25v2

x2=0.25v2

x=v2

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
New answer posted•a year ago
S

No. Since kinetic energy is a scalar quantity, it only depends on speed of the body and not the direction. So if the direction of the body is changed but the speed remains unchanged, there won't be any effect on the kinetic energy. However, if changing the direction also changes the speed of the bod

...Read more

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon
New answer posted•a year ago
S

If you look closely at the formula of kinetic energy (1/2*m*v^2), the velocity is squared which automatically gives a positive integer. And mass of the body can never be a negative value, which leads to the result being a positive integer.

Thumbs Up IconUpvote Thumbs Down Icon