NIMS Institute of Medical and Allied Sciences Faculty Details & Reviews ,Jaipur

Faculty: There are proper practical and theory classes where everything is explained properly under-educated and experienced mentors. The course is elaborate and hands-on experience is given about each subject so that we have the proper knowledge about how to work in industries. Moreover, there are seminars and group discussions where experienced entrepreneurs come and teach us about real-life scenarios and also encourage us to start our own companies. All these things influenced me to choose the course.

Faculty: The course curriculum is good. Industrial Microbiology is a subject which have a wide range of opportunities in R&D and QC Microbiology positions in food and pharmaceutical industries. The curriculum prepares students for real-world applications, like industrial microbiology, pharmaceutical microbiology, food microbiology, and molecular biology, which play a crucial role in the development of a career. Exams are easy, but the teaching methods are poor.

Faculty: Teachers here are very qualified personalities and also very interactive. Faculty members are helpful. If you ask my opinion I would suggest you that don't fully depend on the teachers and try to be more self-working. My time at NIMS University has been a truly enriching experience. Professors are passionate and dedicated. They are always eager to support students' learning and growth. The student body is diverse, and I have met people from all walks of life, making the social experience enjoyab...

Faculty: Currently, I am doing my postgraduate degree in Microbiology. I am interested in learning about the microbial world and also like to research more about their life. The faculty members of the college are highly qualified and most of them have doctoral degrees. They are so supportive of the students.

Faculty: All faculty members were very knowledgeable, kind, helpful, and supportive in nature. The level of exams was medium and sometimes easy as well. Two types of exams were conducted, first, the mid-term exams (20 marks), and second, the final exams (50 marks).

Faculty: Teachers were very helpful to students, and they were very knowledgeable. They were also Ph.D. scholars. The curriculum and syllabus were actually industry-ready. They taught about how to work in industries. Semester exams were easy, not difficult. The pass percentage was 5%.

Faculty: For a year, there were two semesters. Each semester had two exams. For each semester, we had both internal and external exams. Internal exams were midterms, which had a weightage of 40 marks, and external exams had a weightage of 60 marks.

Faculty: Faculty was very good. They were supportive and helped students to progress. There were separate teachers for placement students. They were really good at their own subjects and had knowledge of others as well.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college were good. There were 250 faculty members in our college. Faculty members had a good relationship with students. There were two internals and two quizzes per semester. At end semester exams conducted. After getting admission to the college, you would receive an admission letter from KCET, which would used for your college admission.

Faculty: The teaching method is good and all chapters are studied by screen timing. The exam difficulty levels are hard but teachers make us learn all about our course so there is no rush for exams. Faculty members are the best. The exam is held semester-wise and practical exams are good. Umar Azeem sir is the best faculty member on campus. Faculty members and students relationship is very polite and friendly.

Faculty: This course prepares students for the real world by teaching a varied range of courses such as oceanography, pharmacovigilance, and how to operate heavy machinery in the pharmacy field and also helps link internships in practical fields. If you choose this course then students can opt for various other fields such as research, pharmacy, oceanography, teaching, etc. There are exams conducted at a regular interval of 1.5 months to test the knowledge of students.

Faculty: The microbiology course is the best in the science stream so I decided to choose the third course. Teaching method is so good and all chapters are studied by screen time. The exam difficulty level is hard but teachers taught us about our course so there is no rush for exams.

Faculty: The teaching methods are good and all chapters are studied by screen time. Exams difficulty level is hard but teachers make us learn all about our course. There is no rush for exams. Our class has 80 students.

Faculty: The faculty focus on both experiential and theoretical knowledge. Teachers are qualified and knowledgeable, offering support and helping students with education-related doubts. The course curriculum is relevant, and exams are of a normal difficulty level.

Faculty: All faculty members are good; some are the best; they support us whenever we lose. Interaction between students and teachers feels like family interaction. Management is the worst; managing faculty and students is very bad. Management is not able to schedule lectures carefully and is not good at there work. The course lasts two years and consists of four semesters, two in each year. Each semester, all subjects have a 70–30 pattern: 70 on the end paper and 30 are internal assessment marks.