Reading Comprehension
Get insights from 360 questions on Reading Comprehension, answered by students, alumni, and experts. You may also ask and answer any question you like about Reading Comprehension
Follow Ask QuestionQuestions
Discussions
Active Users
Followers
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 10
Option A can be inferred from the lines “Delhi, one of the most polluted cities in the world, has banned large diesel cars from going into the city centre.”. This represents one of the strongest evidences, other options are far-fetched and represent untrue facts.
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 10
The third option is not stated by WHO, as mentioned in the 9th paragraph: "Delhi, one of the most polluted cities in the world, has banned large diesel cars from going into the city center." The third option contradicts this statement and, hence, forms the correct answer.
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 10
The author has clearly given the indication that “Dinosaur tracks are abundant in this coal formation, and the bones visible in the mine were larger than those of a crocodile—the biggest non-dinosaur known in these rocks.” Woodward has mentioned that bone fragments were larger than crocodile and hence stated it as circumstantial evidence.
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 9
The second statement introduces the topic, and the third statement further elaborates on the fact stated in the second statement. Hence, 23 is a link here. Moreover, the given paragraph can never start from the 4th sentence because it is citing some examples related to another statement. 2314 is the most logical sequence here.
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 10
As mentioned in the 3rd paragraph “The siltstone apparently inhibited fossilization and preserved much of the original cell structure in the bone”. In the first option, opposite of this statement is stated.
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 10
As mentioned in the starting of the passage only- “DNA degrades quickly after an animal dies, so researchers once believed it impossible to find ancient genetic material.”. Researchers later worked on this possibility, hence option B is the best choice.
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 9
The paragraph is based on the order of events. 2 and 3 can never start the paragraph as one uses the conjunction 'BUT' and other 'WHEN' in the beginning. Arranging the given statements as per the order of events only 1324 sequence makes sense.
New answer posted
2 months agoContributor-Level 9
The main idea that the given paragraph shares is that the long-term decline in childhood vaccination rates is a global phenomenon. Only Option A captures this key idea. It also talks about other key ideas stated in the paragraph. Other options are far-fetched as they miss out on some crucial information.
Taking an Exam? Selecting a College?
Get authentic answers from experts, students and alumni that you won't find anywhere else
Sign Up on ShikshaOn Shiksha, get access to
- 65k Colleges
- 1.2k Exams
- 687k Reviews
- 1800k Answers