University College, Sirsa Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: The teachers are good and helpful. The supporting staff is excellent. The syllabus of the current course is outdated and needs to be changed. Exams are very difficult. The university has an outdated syllabus and an ineffective exam pattern, which strictly needs revision. The university does not provide practical knowledge to students. The syllabus should be designed to prepare students to be industry-ready.

Faculty: Being a government college, it is understood that the staff is highly qualified and experienced, with many holding Ph.D. degrees. The B.Com curriculum is very relevant, covering topics related to business, management, and other related fields. The level of exams is easy to moderate, as the syllabus is limited. The college has a high pass percentage.

Faculty: Faculty is overall average. While some teachers are excellent, others are just satisfactory. However, most of the faculty members are well-qualified and experienced. The course curriculum is relevant, especially for students aiming to gain practical knowledge. The semester exams are not very difficult, and the passing criterion is 40%.

Faculty: Faculty is average, like some teachers are very good and some are average. Faculty is well qualified and experienced. Course curriculum is relevant if students focus on gaining practical knowledge. It is not much difficult to pass semester exams, and pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Faculty is average, some teachers are very good and some are average. The faculty is well-qualified and experienced. The course curriculum is relevant if students focus on gaining practical knowledge. It is not very difficult to pass semester exams, and the pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Faculty is average, with some teachers being very good and others being average. However, the faculty is well-qualified and experienced. The course curriculum is relevant, especially if students focus on gaining practical knowledge. Passing semester exams is not very difficult, and the pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Faculty members are average, some teachers are very good, while others are average. Faculty members are well-qualified and experienced. The course curriculum is relevant if students focus on gaining practical knowledge. It is not very difficult to pass the semester exams, and the pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Faculty is average. Some teachers are very good, and some are average. Faculty is well-qualified and experienced. The course curriculum is relevant if students focus on gaining practical knowledge. It is not very difficult to pass semester exams. The pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: I would say teaching staffs are decent. They are well qualified. The course curriculum is also good. Especially after the implementation of NEP 2020, all the courses are taught with the latest curriculum that would help students. Exams are not so hard to pass. Passing percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Teachers are very knowledgeable, qualified, and helpful. Teaching quality is also good and teachers have great knowledge and are very kind. The semester exams are not much more difficult and not more hard to crack the exam. Teachers make papers according to syllabus.

Faculty: The teaching quality was really good. All the teachers were so supportive, experienced and highly qualified. The curriculum was also good. Workshops and lectures were provided. The pass percentage is 40–50%. Teachers motivate us in every aspect.

Faculty: Facilities are well trained for students. Faculty members of this university are kind and disciplined. This university conducts a fair exam with strict rules during the examination. The difficulty of the examination is moderate and the passing rate at this university is approximately 80%.

Faculty: Teachers in our college were good and helped students to solve their problems. They taught well and their teaching method was good so that students easily understood the topic. Our teachers were good.

Faculty: Faculty members were knowledgeable and supportive but some teachers lacked industry experience. The curriculum was mostly theoretical and needed more practical exposure. Exams were manageable, but the evaluation process could be consistent. Overall, the course required an update to match industry standards.

Faculty: All faculty help students to achieve their goals. All the teachers understood the problems of the students to make them feel at home. All the non-teaching staff help students. Teachers encourage students to participate in the functions for skills.