MIT Institute of Design Faculty Details & Reviews ,Loni Kalbhor, Pune

Faculty: The faculty members are the best, having high education and experience in their fields of teaching and physical work. Highly graduated faculty members are cool, friendly, and very helpful in nature, yet strict with attendance and submissions. The load is too much, yet very good. The teaching and knowledge are the best things we are earning throughout college life. The students’ learning makes them industry-ready.

Faculty: Before judging the teaching quality, I think it’s important to understand that in design, you need to take initiative. From my experience, if you don’t ask questions or explore on your own, you won’t grow. Faculty are there to guide, not spoon-feed. Even the basics are taught for a reason. Most design colleges in India follow a similar structure. We don’t have typical exams; we have juries, where your work, presentation, and thinking are what matter. If you’ve done your work sincerely, it’s not ...

Faculty: When substitute teachers take classes due to irregular teacher availability, it can disrupt learning continuity and potential of students which lead to issues with understanding concepts or even grading inconsistencies. Otherwise, teachers are more qualified and experienced in handling the students.

Faculty: Teachers guidance was instrumental in the early days, offering valuable insights and support that paved the way for future growth, learning, and success. The words and their support were really helpful to be focused on our academic journey. I really had a lot of gratitude towards my teachers.

Faculty: Professors in this college are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They teach well in this course. The course curriculum is relevant and prepares students for the industry. Exams are generally easy to pass for our course.

Faculty: The teachers at the college are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They teach well and provide proper guidance to the students. The course curriculum is relevant and makes students industry-ready. Semester exams at our college are tough to pass.

Faculty: Teachers at MIT are highly qualified and knowledgeable. All the teachers have good experience in the teaching field. They are giving their best for the students. The course curriculum at MIT is relevant and it makes the students industry-ready. Teachers were also helpful and supportive of the students during placements. Exams were of a medium-difficult level in our course. Teachers organize various programs for the students knowledge development.

Faculty: Faculty of the college was supporting each and every student. All the teachers were qualified and knowledgeable; teaching quality here in this college was good. Teachers were giving placements and other necessary training to the students, which makes us industry-ready. The course curriculum was relevant. Exams were moderate in difficulty.

Faculty: The curriculum kept changing and updating each year. But the quality of faculty members reduced as good faculty members started leaving after first year. We had the same 3–4 faculty members teaching us different courses in the last year. While the masterjis were really good, the other faculty members used to disregard our mental and physical health. I was hardly comfortable approaching them, as they favoured very few students over the others and would help them move forward in the course.

Faculty: The visiting faculty was great; there were no complaints. They pushed us, gave excellent feedback and prepared us well for the jury. The permanent faculty was disrespectful, almost never gave us anything critical to work on and simply functioned on a biased statement, putting their students down. I had the misfortune of their mentorship only in the final year and I can confidently say I did not learn a single thing from the feedback they gave me and relied on industry mentors I reached out to on...

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and helpful. Semester exams are easy. The course curriculum is great. Assessments are also conducted by teachers.

Faculty: Faculty is each qualified and fit for their own specialisations. HOD are accessible and very student friendly. Curriculum gets adjusted based on the latest students requirements and industry standards. The semester itself is a continuous evaluation process, assignments and developments are continuously checked and evaluated by given mentors. The jury is the final exam which comprised 20%of the total score.

Faculty: Faculty is not cooperative, they only want assignments and submissions. The faculty will teach you only as much as it's there in the Curriculum and just take your assignment submissions. Curriculum doesn't make students industry ready. Exams/juries seem to be useless.

Faculty: Faculty members are very helpful and qualified. The teaching quality is high, and students can understand easily. The teacher-student relationship is friendly, and they are very encouraging and make students ready for industry. The semester exams depend on the presentation of their work, and the pass percentage is 33%.

Faculty: Teachers are good, but there is a shortage of faculty members in UX. We have a lot of faculty members from the industry, and they provide very good insights. The curriculum is updated according to the trends, and students get ready to work in the industry by graduation.