RGIPT Amethi Faculty Details & Reviews ,Amethi

Faculty: Professors are knowledgeable and qualified. Professors are helpful to every student. Their behavior is also good. The difficulty level of semester exams is moderate. They are supportive in a bad phase.

Faculty: The curriculum of college is so random and not up to the mark because of a lack of faculty members. The teachers here are qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable, but due to a lack of faculty members they are overloaded with courses, which they fails to deliver their best. The course curriculum is not relevant at all, it fails to make students industry-ready. The semester exams are at a decent level mostly to test concept and understanding of the subject rather than mugging. Almost the majority of...

Faculty: Teachers are good, but the course structure is worse. They teach only the book concepts and focus on exams, not on real-life job skills. Semester exams are not that difficult; the pass percentage is great. They conduct labs and workshops, but they are not useful as they are quite outdated.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful and qualified from foreign universities. The teaching quality is good. The course curriculum aligns with competitive exams like GATE and placements. The difficulty of the semester exam is moderate, usually covering what is taught in the class. The pass CGPA is 5.

Faculty: Teachers mainly come who have done Ph.D. or Masters from abroad. I might say that they are qualified enough. The curriculum is good, there is a lab and workshop every week. Basically, semester exams are easy for those who study a little bit. They repeat questions from previous years. Almost 90 percent of students pass the semester examination (not sure).

Faculty: The curriculum is not good at all (I am talking with respect to my branch, EV). The faculty focuses mainly on GATE and government job exams, and lastly, Ph.D. exams. No proper guidance or help for placement and job-ready skills; they only want us to attend lectures and score marks, which depend on rote learning.

Faculty: Faculty can vary according to your branch, and in the end, it depends on the person to develop skills and create a better version of themselves. There are weekly quizzes and a large library to help the students. The seniors can also be very helpful in academics.

Faculty: Even the HOD for the CS department is from the civil branch. They do not have good faculty members who are specialized enough for particular CS branch. Faculty members are well qualified but they are not as specialized in CS. They don't even know how to teach good. Students have to prepare all on their own to get off-campus placements.

Faculty: Faculty members are helpful and qualified, but not that much as compared to IITs. The teaching quality is average, while the course curriculum is above average and relevant to the petroleum industry, making students ready for the industry. The semester exams are above average in difficulty, and there are very strict rules and regulations set by the academic. But, the pass percentage is around 95%.

Faculty: Highly qualified teachers who have done their PhDs from IITs or foreign universities with very good teaching quality. Relevant course structure, which makes students ready for the industry. High pass percentage, but getting high grades like A or A+ is difficult.

Faculty: The faculty members are really good. The IT branch curriculum is really good as well. Most professors make efforts to guide students, and the way they teach is decent. They are qualified and know their subject well. CSE department professors are really supportive.

Faculty: Faculty is good. Teacher assistants are also good, and lab assistants are also good. Professors are not skilled. Semester exams are easy, and the study material provided to students is good. The course content is not industry-ready, and it is very difficult to relate the course content to industry demand.

Faculty: Teachers are well qualified, but we all know that qualifications and ways of teaching are different. Some of the faculty members are good at teaching, while you have to compromise with some of them. The course curriculum is relevant, but it doesn't make you ready for the industry, especially for tech branches.

Faculty: The teachers and faculty members are good qualified. Most of them are graduates of IITs, top international institutes, or they have done their Ph.D. or postdoc from top-tier research universities. The course curriculum is relevant and inspired by the New Education Policy, streamlined with the job needs of today.

Faculty: Teachers were highly qualified and helpful; their teaching quality is very good. Yes, the course curriculum is totally relevant. Yes, it makes the students industry-ready. Semester exams are hard as the teaching is of good level, and there is relatively little marking for students.