Thiruvalluvar University Faculty Details & Reviews ,Vellore

Faculty: In my batch, my teachers are very mindful and knowledgeable. But this course is not helpful for me. Semester exams are somewhat difficult. There may be no microphones or sound system, making it difficult to hear lectures. Poor internet connectivity and a lack of charging points hinder digital learning. Accessibility features for differently abled students are usually missing, and maintenance is neglected, leading to unhygienic and unsafe conditions.

Faculty: All of our esteemed instructors are extremely helpful and well-trained. Well qualified and experienced. They have knowledge too. Our college prepares every student for the modern industry to secure a high-paying career. Our college offers us many digital classes on projectors and participate in many camps or programs. Exams are not that hard, and pass rate is over 80%.

Faculty: You have to study on your own. Faculty are also students in college; they don’t know anything. In computer-related courses, they don't teach how to use the computer for coding, trying to skip that part for every student. There aren’t sufficient systems and software either.

Faculty: Teachers are knowledgeable and friendly. The semesters are moderate, and the pass percentage is high. The campus is large with many facilities. It has a peaceful environment and has received an A grade from NAAC. NCC is also well-represented and valued at the college.

Faculty: Semester exams are so much tough when it comes to our college. Most teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable in their subjects. The teaching quality is generally good, with a mix of theoretical and practical knowledge. The course curriculum is somewhat relevant, but it could be updated to better reflect industry needs. Some topics are outdated, while others are too theoretical.

Faculty: Most of the teachers are qualified, supportive, and experienced in their subject areas. They explain concepts in a simple and understandable way. The teaching quality is generally good, and some teachers go beyond the syllabus by providing real-world examples and extra materials. However, the quality can vary slightly depending on the subject or department. The autonomous curriculum is regularly updated, and it covers important industry-related topics like programming languages (C, C+, java, pyt...

Faculty: The college is not so good, but it's above-average, that's all. Some teachers are well-trained and very experienced, and their teaching is very cool. The main semester exams are very easy, but once you have an arrear, the re-exams are very tough and very difficult to clear the semester papers.

Faculty: Faculty members are knowledgeable and well educated. They guarantee that the pupils comprehend the idea. Weaker students have access to additional classes as well. They make sure every student passes their tests and work very hard to achieve this. 60% of students pass the comparatively difficult semester exams.

Faculty: Attendance performances are maintained by the teacher in each and every period. Mostly teachers prefers on practical teachings and they believe it would be perfect method for teachings. All our records are maintained in the personal notebooks of the teachers issued by the college.

Learning Experience: I got through knowledge and gained a huge experience by handling lot of patients under the supervision of the faculties.Sometimes they gave suggestions on required cases like which was not familiar to us.

Faculty: It's complex for me to do a post-graduate program along with training. I went through a lot of work pressure along with the course. Lectures are excellent in the profession of handling patients with good work ethics. They also wanted us to learn the same from them. They are known for their excellent practical training on live patients.

Faculty: Students' academic performance was appreciated and honored by the department head. The worst thing about faculty members was that they were punished for every mistake, even if it was a small one. Teachers had strict invigilance over the activities of students.

Faculty: Nearly 7 to 8 teachers are assigned for all the semesters. They are responsible for handling theoretical classes, practical classes, and other responsibilities. Teachers help us to complete our research and project within the time period. Only 2 to 3 theoretical classes are conducted in a day.

Faculty: Teachers teaching is nice but some are not prepared well. They taught us wrong if we say this is wrong means they have vengeance on us. Their teaching does not make them industry-ready. If we study 50% of syllabi we can take a 60-70% score in the semester. There is only one teacher for sports that also he did not do his work properly.

Faculty: The course curriculum is very average. Teachers only have average knowledge. The course curriculum does not help to survive in the industry company. Semester examination corrections are very poor. They put marks that they want, and there is no proper correction. When we apply for evaluation, they don't show the marks award in the paper, then how can we further proceed to evaluation?

Faculty: The staff helped students in any way they could to make sure they understood the content. The course curriculum was enough. Although challenging, the semester exam was not very intensive. For UG students, the semester test structure consisted of 50 internal and 50 external marks.