Mumbai University Faculty Details & Reviews ,Fort

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful for students, and they have so much knowledge of studies, and the teaching quality is very good for me. If I don't understand, they help me to get it, and they are very friendly to students, talking politely. Overall, all the teachers are good.

Faculty: Few teachers are not that good, but faculty is mostly qualified, with many holding Ph.D. degrees. The curriculum is relevant and makes students industry-ready if they put in effort. Obviously, we cannot solely depend on teachers. We must study ourselves as well.

Faculty: We have well-experienced teachers who are very helpful. Our semester exams are moderate, and anyone who concentrates in class can easily pass. All the subjects taught are helpful during placements and interviews. We have two unit tests every semester of 20 marks each, and from the second year onwards, we have mini projects.

Faculty: Last semester, for the experiments we were absent, we needed to pay a 100 rupee fine, and they were even giving treats in the final year internal exam. No viva was conducted without a fine. No job. Old syllabus does not focus on practical learning. Many of my friends and I lack practical experience or knowledge. Teachers are cooperative and helpful, but some are not qualified. I think so, after M.Tech, they start their teaching journey. Few teachers are only B.Tech. Some do not even know how to ...

Faculty: The faculty members in my college are quite supportive, because of the change in syllabus by Mumbai University, new subjects are added in our semester exams, so right now my college is suffering a little bit. But overall, faculty members are good and well educated. The only thing you have to remember before joining a college is that you are not a small kid for whom teachers start teaching with ABCD, you already have an awareness of some basic concepts which you have learned earlier.

Faculty: The curriculum provided by my college is quite old-fashioned, focusing more on theory than on practical knowledge, so it's difficult for the students to manage skills and CGPA at the same time. I don't understand the curriculum much, but I guess we have to do.

Faculty: They are excellent in teaching, they are always willing to help the students with the doubts the students have in class and also outside the classrooms, they help students on WhatsApp if they are not too busy. 80% is the pass percentage.

Faculty: Some teachers are good, while others don't seem to be very experienced. Exams are conducted well. College exams and university papers are organized properly. If you study the important topics, the semester exams are easy. Most students pass the exams, but some get a KT.

Faculty: Teachers are good at teaching, but to be honest, they have a lot of unnecessary ego and pride in their work. Their job is to teach, but if one is left out, they let it be. Instead of being good teachers, some even make students comply with useless stuff, like making them sit for extra hours unnecessarily. If they leave, they mark the student absent for the whole day, even for the lectures the student has attended, which creates attendance issues. The exams are hosted well, though, and that's the...

Faculty: Some faculty members are good, and few teachers are very helpful. However, many teachers are leaving the college. The exams are decent, but the curriculum is not very relevant. It does not make students industry-ready. The biggest drawback is that the college management is quite disorganized, which is not a good sign.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful. If you are a talented or a quick learner, then you will ask many questions. Teachers will help you all the time. Course curriculum is relevant, and we get the industry ready. Because of the curriculum, the semester exams are difficult as usual. It is up to you how much study you do. The passing percentage is 65%, and I guess 50% something.

Faculty: Teachers are too qualified and knowledgeable, they are Masters in their field. We have a chartered accountant as a professor in our college. The exams of B.Com are not that tough, we can easily start studying a week before and easily pass with good marks.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and professional in their field. They have experience of more than a decade, as of now, my course is still far better and relevant subjects, but we got a sub named business communication, which seems irrelevant, and we can't opt to change it.

Faculty: DY Patil University has a positive reputation for its faculty. The teachers are often described as being qualified and knowledgeable, with many of them holding PhDs and doctorates. The overall teaching quality is considered as effective, with a focus on being student-centric.

Faculty: Teachers are too good. They are well qualified. Some of the professors have a master's degree in their field. Some of them are chartered accountants, and they motivate us. This course curriculum is not relevant to me as we have botany as per new education policy, which is one of the weakest subjects I had in school times. It is now in my course and it's open elective subject but still no one has right to choose subjects by their own.