B K Birla Institute of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Pilani

Faculty: Best faculty and good professors, lab assistants, and many experienced HODs. The director of BK Birla Institute of Engineering and Technology is from BITS Pilani, the principal is from BITS Pilani, and some other professors and teachers are also graduates of BITS Pilani.

Faculty: The teachers at the college are helpful and well-qualified. They know their subjects and explain things clearly, making it easier to understand. The course curriculum is up-to-date and useful for getting jobs in the industry. It includes important topics that help students become ready for work. The semester exams are not too difficult but still test your knowledge well. Most students pass their exams on time.

Faculty: Our college is under BTU and they organize semester exams very late. Most students pass semester exams and only 10% of students out of 100% fail semester exam. Faculty members are nice, they help alot in exams and college also sessional exams by which students can easily attempt semester exam. All courses are great and useful in their fields. I am a student of computer science branch in which I learned many things and programming language and other subjects also. The difficulty level of exams is...

Faculty: The great thing regarding the college is its faculty; they support at every stage, and teaching quality is good. Curriculum is also relevant. The difficulty level is 7/10. The passing percentage is 40-50%. The only bad thing is that there is a need for only good companies to come for placements on the campus related to the domain.

Faculty: The teachers in my college are very kind to students in their studies and help everyone by sharing their knowledge, ideas, and thoughts. They also assist students with their personal matters. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant and also makes students industry-ready.

Faculty: Teachers are good but not very good. They only have to complete the syllabus, and nothing else. They do not want to give proper knowledge to students. They only want to complete the syllabus. They are not too qualified and not too knowledgeable. They are quite good.

Faculty: The teachers at my college are very kind to students in their studies and help everyone by sharing their ideas and thoughts. They also assist students in their personal matters. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant to students and also helps in making students industry-ready.

Faculty: In my college, teachers are very kind to students with their studies and help everyone with their knowledge by sharing their ideas and thoughts, and they also help students in their personal matters too. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant to students and also makes students industry-ready.

Faculty: The faculty here are really nice and helpful; they do not pressure students for attendance or studies. They are well qualified and talented, too. Yes, the course curriculum is relevant but the university always delays final exams as compared to other universities but the college always tries to complete the course on time.

Faculty: Faculty members are good, but the exam schedule is not good at all; the passing rate of students is average. The course is relevant, but it does not prepare us for our industry or placements because it is only for our university examinations; it is relevant only for exams.

Faculty: Teachers play a crucial role in providing assistance and support to students, showcasing their extensive knowledge in both theoretical and practical aspects. They not only impart knowledge but also foster a friendly environment by treating students as friends and guiding them along their educational journey. However, when it comes to examinations, certain subjects pose significant challenges in terms of passing.

Faculty: Teachers were helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, enhancing the teaching quality. Course curriculum was relevant. Exams are moderately challenging, with a reasonable pass percentage. Pass percentages are typically high, ensuring students' success and progression.

Faculty: The examination is conducted at unpredictable dates and times, and the faculty is satisfactory but not exceptional. The curriculum primarily emphasizes academic preparedness rather than industry readiness, with minimal support for industrial visits and training. Additionally, the exam pattern is inconsistent, and the evaluation process and result declaration are consistently delayed.

Faculty: The teachers were qualified, but unfortunately, they were not helpful towards students. The course curriculum was relevant, but the teachers were not. Semester exams were challenging, requiring students to work hard to pass. Diligent studying is necessary to clear the exams.

Faculty: No, the curriculum changes because of BTU, and no proper scheduling of exams can be held at random events. Also, the classes is basically like reading by a narrator so it's a great experience there. Also, the examination checking that's done via university is also not great; they supply no. At random and also because the back evaluation results were declared after the back exams, there is no point in filling out that form.