Majlis Polytechnic College Faculty Details & Reviews ,Malappuram

Faculty: Our college runs semester exams, with two internal series exams each time. The subjects feel real-world, and the labs are super industry-focused, prepping us for jobs. But those semester exams, they're tough, with a low pass rate, so we're always hitting the books.

Faculty: One problem in our college is the teaching quality. The way of teaching is very basic and many times it does not go beyond the textbook. Because of this, students don't get enough depth in the subject, and it becomes hard to apply the knowledge in real life. Classes often feel like just note reading, without much explanation or examples.

Faculty: The faculty in our course is decent, though the teaching quality really depends on the professor. Some are very supportive and explain things well, while others are not as engaging. The curriculum is okay, but it feels a little outdated compared to what companies look for today. Exams are fair and not too difficult, but they often focus more on theory than practical skills. Overall, it's manageable but has scope for improvement, so I'd give it 3 stars.

Faculty: Faculty members are cooperative, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is average. The course curriculum is not relevant, but it will get you job-ready because it's a professional curriculum, unlike other diplomas. The pass percentage in semester exams is average.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and friendly, but they are not very qualified or experienced. They are freshers. The course prepares students for industry through practical work because there are a lot of labs. The semester exams are difficult. The pass percentage in the first year is high, but it is low in later years.

Faculty: The faculty is okay but not very supportive at times, which makes it difficult for students to get proper guidance. The curriculum feels outdated and does not provide enough practical exposure that is needed for the industry. Exams are not well managed, and the evaluation process is often unfair, which creates stress among students. Overall, the system needs a lot of improvement in teaching quality, syllabus update, and exam organisation to give students a better learning experience.

Faculty: Teachers are freshers, and there isn't a lot of experienced staff, but all the staff members are friendly and supportive. The curriculum prepares you for the industry because it includes a lot of practical work, not just theory. The semester exams are medium, not too difficult.

Faculty: I am satisfied with the curriculum. There is a lot of practicality compared to others. There are a lot of labs, the first is basics of engineering and science. In the second year, you will actually enter the department. Its an industry ready curriculum. In case of exams, there are 2 internal exams in a semester. The semester is not that difficult, if you are interested in the department. You will get pass over it.

Faculty: The teachers are talkative and always helping. The last two semesters are little difficult, teachers were so good at teaching. They know everything, they are so good at everything Semester exams are little tough.

Faculty: Most teachers are less experienced, but the courses remain relevant to the curriculum. Practical classes are designed to be industry-ready, helping students gain useful skills. Exams are not very tough, making it relatively easy for students to pass without much pressure.

Faculty: Faculty members are below average because there are no experienced faculty members. The course curriculum is relevant, with a lot of practical and real-life relevant subjects. Semester exams are not that difficult, but the pass percentage is still low, which I think is because of the faculty members.

Faculty: Teachers only read from notes without explaining. The pass mark is 30, and mobile phones are strictly prohibited. Teachers cut attendance for not bringing records or notes. If a student is delayed by 10 minutes, there is a Rs. 10 fine.

Faculty: Teachers were good, helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality was also good. There was a workshop for students in the first year, which was very helpful to make students industry-ready. Semester exams were conducted by the state board of technical education i.e., the government. The pass percentage was 40 out of 100. Semester exams difficulty level was moderate.