St. Michael College of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Tamil Nadu - Other

Faculty: Teachers are very friendly and really helpful. The teaching quality is really good. As it is an Anna University-affiliated college, exams are quite difficult, but maximum students pass. Course does make students industry-ready through many labs.

Faculty: Faculty members were experienced people and they were highly qualified. They taught very well. Every week, model tests were conducted. They conducted extra curricular activities and programs too. Industry visits were arranged. 95% students passed in all exams.

Faculty: Faculty members here help students very much, and they are excellent. Their teaching quality is very good, but not excellent. This course curriculum makes students industry-ready. Staff members of this college are qualified and knowledgeable.

Faculty: Some of the staff members here are highly knowledgeable, and their techniques and teaching are highly professional. But fresher staff members lag at teaching as they just focus on completing the course and don't consider students whether they understand or not. They consider only theory and never consider providing practical knowledge, which is a disadvantage. They conduct some classes for futuristic about how to ready for interviews. Some of the course curriculum relevant subjects like Q and ta...

Faculty: The teaching is also good. I can't say negative feedback about teaching staff. The college management is the only major drawback. The faculty members of every department take their responsibility for their teaching. They did their excellent teaching for their earnings. The course is good in the way of theoretical but didn't gain any knowledge practically. Overall, the practical experience is zero when you complete your degree.

Faculty: The faculty and course curriculum of the college are worst because they are not following Anna University curriculum. They don't complete the course ever, and they always appoint recent college passed outs as teachers. They don't have any proper experience, and not aware of proper teaching techniques.

Faculty: Only countable faculty members were qualified and knowledgeable, the others were all with a B.E. degree to their names. Student to faculty ration was 60:1, for 60 students 1 faculty was assigned. Industry exposure was given properly, that too was allowed because of strike created by students. The course curriculum was not that much useful, we all learned by our own.

Faculty: 50% of faculty members with doctorate degree and 25% of faculty members are pursuing doctorate degree. Course covered with both the 2017 and 2021 regulation. Students provided with the internship with the MOUs signed by the various companies by the department.