Maharishi University of Information Technology Lucknow Faculty Details & Reviews ,Lucknow

Faculty: Our teachers are very helpful and elegant. Course is curriculum-relevant. Exams are not difficult, nor do they need a high percentage. Everything is in the college, so you can come and see it.

Faculty: Teachers were very helpful and highly qualified in most subjects. The report of teachers was also conducted at regular intervals to check their performance. The course curriculum was relevant and made students industry-ready. Exams were programmed to test the intelligence of students and were of moderate level toughness. The passing percentage was around 85-90%.

Faculty: Faculty members are exceptionally good. They provide valuable assistance to students. Teachers are very good and knowledgeable. Staff members are also good in behavior. The course curriculum is industry-focused with a focus on algorithms, data structures, and programming.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. They are extremely helpful and have a helping nature, assisting each and every student. The course curriculum is good and helps students understand the concepts easily. It prepares students to be industry-ready and to find jobs. The semester can be challenging for some students. Overall, the pass percentage is 50%.

Faculty: Teachers on this campus were very helpful. They were highly qualified and knowledgeable. The course curriculum was relevant and made the students industry-ready. If I talk about the difficulty level of the semester, I can say it was average, neither too difficult nor too easy. The pass percentage was 50%.

Faculty: Not every, but some teachers are helpful. They are qualified Ph.D. holders and knowledgeable. They teach quite well. For the curriculum, they provide everyone with the TM course which is transcendental meditation for the meditation purpose. Semester exams are not much hard. It is average.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful. There is better teaching quality. Exams are not so difficult. It is good. The course makes students ready for industry. Exams are average. The pass passing percentage is decent. It is not very high.

Faculty: Teachers, staff, and professors are helpful and very cooperative. They help students in all ways and are approachable to them. Teachers at the university encourage students to interact with learning and develop skills.

Faculty: Faculty members are good, but not everyone. A few faculty members are good. The major problem is they don't listen to students' problems carefully and try to blame them. I wasn't satisfied with faculty members, especially those in higher posts who are from the administrative department.

Faculty: Our course faculty members are not cooperative. They always try to escape from queries and complaints. The course curriculum and exam pattern are well-designed, but students have to prepare for their exams on their own. The difficult level of exams is medium.

Faculty: Not one teacher is helpful. I don't think they are qualified and also not knowledgeable and the quality of the teachers is OK. This course curriculum is not relevant. They don't make students industry-ready. The semester exams were different and not given much time.

Faculty: Faculty members are well-educated and experienced. They support us, and they are well-mannered. The course curriculum is good; it covers physiology, zoology, botany, and chemistry with practical and theory. There are two semester exams every year, and the paper level is moderate.

Faculty: Our teachers are well qualified and experienced. The quality of teaching is good and complimentary. The course curriculum is relevant. It's beneficial but I will say practical knowledge is also needed for experience. Semester exam are average to high. The passing percentage is also high.

Faculty: The faculty are very helpful, well qualified and knowledgeable. Most of the teachers are at the Ph.D. level and some are at the master's level. Semester exam difficulty is average, passing percentage is 60 percent, and the curriculum of B.Pharma is relevant.

Faculty: The faculty of the college was helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable for this course. The quality of the teaching was good. The course curriculum of the college was relevant, making the students industry-ready. Semester exams of the college were not hard to pass.