Anand School of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Agra

Faculty: Faculty members were excellent. They were helpful, knowledgeable, and highly qualified. Semester exams are conducted every six months. Most of the students passed the exams.

Faculty: Teachers in our college are highly qualified and supportive. The course curriculum makes students ready for industry. Semester exams are averagely tough. Around 30% of marks are required to pass exams. Teachers motivate students to do well in their academics and get placed.

Faculty: The quality of education is good, but there is a possibility that it could be better if it were done according to the feedback of students. The syllabus is insufficient to complete in the allotted time. The main sources are the notes provided by the faculty and books from the library.

Faculty: The faculty members are well experienced in their campus and their field. The Anand college has especially for computer Science and technologies stream. The faculty staff has much qualified and highly professional. Faculty have most of the time live in their department and are always ready to help any student at any time. The only thing the faculty methodology in the teaching is on the syllabus which has provided by the University.

Faculty: Faculty members of AEC are well qualified and knowledgeable. The relationship between teacher and student is good. They help students every time to improve them in every good area. The course is relevant to industry level. The semester examination is not hard to pass because, after every 1 and a half unit of your course, you face a sessional examination.

Faculty: Yes, the Teachers were good and helpful, qualified and knowledgeable. The quality of teaching for above average. Curriculum can be changed and made a little tough for students to make them industry-ready as there were no subjects in the 6th semester and most of the subjects or topics were removed which was not quite helpful. No semester exams were not as difficult as they used to be. The pass percentage record of our college was approximately 60% of the students.

Faculty: Teachers are not too highly qualified and are though not so much knowledge, and they are only performing their duties for the students. The semester exams are too difficult for us because of the lack of teaching by the teachers. The labs are not done properly.

Faculty: Semester exams were moderate. We have to go to some other colleges to give exams. Our college is affiliated with Lucknow University, and we get average results. Basics and some conceptual questions are asked in exams.

Faculty: Our teachers are very helpful. They are highly qualified and knowledgeable. Yes, this course curriculum is relevant. Yes, it makes the students' industry-ready.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified, and most of them done their education from institutes like IITs and NITs. The teaching quality is good, like the old school method of teaching in classes. For the first year, the course is not relevant in any way, but after that, it helps to make students work-ready. Semester exams are not that difficult if you study.

Faculty: Teachers are only qualified on the papers, but they are useless in the practical. Students know more than teachers. Every student is placed because of their hard work. There is no help from our teachers. The course curriculum is very irrelevant, and its only focus is on passing the semester.

Faculty: All the department teachers have very good skills. All teachers support and help students every time. They are experts. For all courses, there is a different fee structure. B.Pharma and D.Pharma courses are available here.

Faculty: The teaching quality of college is not good. Most of the faculty members were unable to complete their courses within time. The course curriculum we learnt was not as per the modern trend. It needs to be changed. It is not a relevant course. It doesn't make students ready for industries.

Faculty: Teachers here are very helpful to the students as they are highly knowledgeable. Mostly all teachers use the projector system to teach students. The course curriculum is based on university guidelines, so it is relevant. It makes students ready for the industry.

Faculty: In my opinion, the quality of teaching is below average. Mostly faculty are unable to complete their courses within given time. It is not helpful for the students. The course curriculum which we have studied is on pattern of University, which I don't think is useful for the students as it is very old course. This course doesn't make the students ready for industry.