GITAM School of Science, Visakhapatnam Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: The quality of teaching was extraordinary. Learners engage in a research-oriented atmosphere. The coursework was structured to allow students to seek a Ph.D. later on. In comparison to other universities, semester examinations were challenging and occurred often. However, the course is well executed, and the instruction is of high quality.

Faculty: Teachers are professional and qualified. The teaching quality is good and well-trained. The food technology course curriculum is relevant. It can make students industry-ready. It largely depends on how well the curriculum is designed and updated to reflect the current industry and the practical skills. Semester exams are much more difficult to vary in different subjects. The pass percentage is 35%.

Faculty: Here, teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. They are teaching very nicely and are close to students. They are very friendly to students while teaching. We have a monthly exam for students. Our dean conducts exams very strictly. We have compulsory attendance for writing exams.

Faculty: The teachers were very helpful to us. Even at teaching the subjects and also helping us in doing the projects. They are also highly knowledgeable, qualified, and helpful. Semester exams are a bit difficult since everything is a matter of results. So it does matter, and it is a bit difficult.

Faculty: The faculty members are typically supportive of offering guidance and most faculty members hold advanced degrees with expertise and focus on practical application through real-world projects case studies and hands-on lab sessions and internships which are often integrated.

Faculty: Faculty at GITAM Visakhapatnam for BCA is average. Some teachers explain well, while others focus more on theory. Doubt-solving sessions are available, but practical learning needs improvement. The BCA curriculum covers programming, databases, networking, and web development. It provides a basic foundation, but extra practice and internships are needed to be industry-ready. More hands-on learning would be helpful. The semester exams are moderate, and scoring is okay if students study regularly. ...

Faculty: The teachers here are highly qualified with Ph.D. degrees and they have vast knowledge and experience in the courses. The exams here are a little bit difficult to crack, but the faculty members help in that case. They teach us what is needed and give so much of their time to teach us.

Faculty: The faculty members are very helpful, qualified and knowledgeable, and the teaching style is good. This course curriculum is relevant; it is based on the real-world problem, and the teachers teach the real-world problem. There is no difficulty in the semester exam; if you are good at studying, you can clear the exam easily.

Faculty: The teachers are highly qualified, and interaction between students and teachers is very good. Teachers make sure students understand every concept and prepare well for the board examination. The course curriculum is good, and the passing percentage for the exam is 60%. The quality of teaching is very good.

Faculty: Some faculty are very good and have good knowledge, but some of them don't have knowledge and just teach using PowerPoints and don't explain anything. For us, there will be one midterm for each semester, two lab exams, and the final semester exam. Semester exam and mid exam are for 30 marks only. Internals are for 70 marks.

Faculty: The faculty is dependent on the person who teaches. There is a different style for each of the professors; some of them have there best style the same way some have the worst side but every professor teaching has somehow good experience teaching. Also, there might be some issues with professors for grading and teaching methods, like using only ppts, which would probably frustrate you but guess what everyone does? Either relying on or complaining, try to read the PPT and correlate with the profes...

Faculty: Yes, teachers are well qualified and helpful too. They explain very clearly by using PowerPoints. The course syllabus is very relevant. The exam level is moderate, and the pass percentage is 40 percent. Some faculty are simply reading PowerPoints, which is not supportive but most of them are very supportive.

Faculty: The faculty of the college are the best at teaching and are even friendly. Some are strict with the rules and regulations. As I had joined a month late, I didn't find anything difficult, either in learning or understanding the lectures, as they were so informative and friendly in teaching the lectures again and again for those who were unable to understand and learn. Because of this, I could easily link up with the syllabus that was earlier taught.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified, but some of them do not have enough teaching skills. The exam pattern they follow is a 70 to 30 pattern. They allocate 70 marks for internals, i.e., for minds, quizzes, and assignments. The remaining 30 marks are for semester end exams. The difficulty level of semester end exams is medium; those who prepare well for internals can easily attempt semester end exams as well.

Faculty: The faculty members are well-spoken and help you to perform well. They are highly approachable and also motivate us to score well. The grading system is really bad. The semester exams are very easy for someone who attends the college regularly and pays attention in lectures.