JBIT Dehradun Faculty Details & Reviews ,Dehradun

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is good. They help students. The course curriculum is relevant, and it makes students industry-ready. A maximum of students pass exams. But students who have not studied in college or themselves have not passed. Faculty members are friendly and supportive. If we go to them, they will help us.

Faculty: At JBIT College, the faculty members are the best in the area, and they are very experienced. The exam procedure is very good because the faculty is strictly focused and trained. The exam results will be out after one or two months. Before the exam, they give us the important questions to read and practice.

Faculty: Teachers are well qualified. They have good knowledge. The teaching quality is medium. It does not make students for the industry use, it very less. I have not seen such a quality built into a student for industry use. The semester exams are moderate.

Faculty: Teachers are good. All the faculty members are very supportive, and they always help students in every field. They encourage the students to do research work also. Exams are taken regularly after 2 months in each semester, and there are 2 or 3 internal exams taken.

Faculty: The teachers are very helpful, well-qualified, and possess extensive knowledge and experience. The quality of the faculty is excellent. The course study and other curriculum activities are good, including industry visits that prepare students for future work, inspiring them.

Faculty: In our first year, the teachers were very helpful. Many qualified teachers left the college within just 2 to 3 months of their notice period. Now, in our third year, the teaching quality has declined compared to the first year. Course curriculum is not relevant, and it does not prepare students for the industry-ready. It is difficult to pass semester exams because there is no support from internal marks. Even if we perform well in internals, our final marks depend more on the teacher’s perspecti...

Faculty: Teachers are experienced and supportive, teaching with real-world examples for better understanding. The curriculum is regularly updated to match industry standards. Exams are fair, well-structured, and include both theoretical and practical application-based questions for balanced evaluation.

Faculty: All faculty members are polite and helpful, always ready to assist students with their problems. The courses and other curricular activities prepare students well for fieldwork and industry. While the semester exams can be challenging, the teachers' methods of instruction are sufficient to help students succeed.

Faculty: Teachers are perfect. They support them a lot and help them out with their syllabus and their doubts. They give extra classes and extra knowledge other than their subjects which is very helpful for the students. They motivate their students.

Faculty: Most teachers are qualified but often use traditional methods with limited practical focus. The curriculum covers core topics like Data Structures and OS but is somewhat outdated and misses newer industry trends like cloud, AI/ML, and real-world projects. Overall, teaching quality is average.

Faculty: It is difficult to pass semester exams because faculty members check our copies. They hired many teachers, and many of them are sleeping guys, so students have a 50% chance to pass exams if students write very clearly. If they have a clear explanation then they can have a 100% of chance passing. If they have bad handwriting then they have to work hard.

Faculty: Some teachers are amazing and some are not. Teachers teach enough for a student to perform well in university examinations but practical knowledge is less. In labs, we are not taught properly. Mostly, teachers are young and teach here only for experience.

Faculty: Teachers in our department are highly qualified, supportive, and have good subject knowledge. They use practical examples and modern teaching methods like presentations, coding practice, and project-based learning. The course curriculum is mostly relevant to current industry demands, covering topics like Data Structures, Web Development, DBMS, and emerging technologies like AI and Cloud Computing. While there is scope for improvement in industry exposure, the foundation is strong. The semester e...

Faculty: Teachers are helpful but the institutions don't provide that much effort. Course curriculum of the university is very outdated and it doesn't make students industry-ready. Semester exams are good but the copies are not checked properly and students get fewer marks.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified, helpful, and have good subject knowledge. Teaching quality is decent, with some faculty being very effective. The course curriculum is mostly relevant and covers important technical subjects, making students fairly industry-ready, though practical exposure can be improved. Semester exams are moderately difficult and follow the taught syllabus. With consistent study, passing is manageable. The average pass percentage is around 85%-90%, and students who attend classes regul...