MCE Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kottayam

Faculty: Every faculty member is the best but the majority of them are very good at teaching and have a great teaching experience. They always try their best to give us 100 percent. Course and curriculum are based on KTU. But it also seems to be okay. For me previous 2 semesters exams are not that hard. Cleared it with no supplementary exams.

Faculty: While most teachers are excellent, others are not. I appreciated the teachers' demeanor and approach since they always adhered to the syllabus and provided thorough notes on every subject covered in class. Some of the highly qualified faculty members at the college are unaware of the objective of teaching. Classes taught by male teachers are generally exceedingly dull. There are a few excellent professors whom we particularly enjoy. Most of the instructors used PowerPoint presentations to teach....

Faculty: The instructors are very helpful, competent, and knowledgeable. Most of our teachers have work experience in top companies. They train us well and guide us on how to be better leaders. They also advise us and give us the right training to put us in the right place.

Faculty: MCE’s faculty are mostly PhDs with industry exposure. They teach clearly and mentor well. The CBCS curriculum includes current AI/ML tools, labs, and internships, so grades are job-ready. Semester exams focus on concepts; difficulty is moderate, and around 82% of students pass each term.

Faculty: Teachers are well-educated and highly qualified. The quality of education is good. If we are willing to study, we can achieve good grades. Teachers do their best to teach us, and it's our responsibility to study and perform well. Semester exams are conducted by the university and are sometimes more difficult compared to the internal exams.

Faculty: Teachers in our college are good. They are very qualified and have a good amount of industry experience. They make college life easy in terms of studies and other activities. The course curriculum is also very relevant to that of the industry.

Faculty: AI & ML faculty members are helpful and qualified. They provide good teaching with industry exposure. The course curriculum is job-oriented, covering AI, ML, and cloud topics. Exams are moderate and require conceptual clarity. The pass rate is 80-90% with proper preparation and focus.

Faculty: All faculty members are very good in our college, environment, and good syllabus-based curriculum. The curriculum helps you improve your work. Conveniently located and in a professional atmosphere, the college is spacious enough to be ideal for students to study and develop their careers.

Faculty: I would rate 4 stars for the faculty members. They actually take care of students like their children and spoon-feed the syllabus. If students have the mindset to study and pass, faculty members are good overall. Mangalam is a good option. I reduced 1 star because of KTU University.

Faculty: Teachers are very qualified. This college has NBA accreditation for 4 courses. It has an A in NAAC. Teachers are very knowledgeable and put great efforts to teach students.. The pass percentage is 75%. This course is a little difficult and requires more efforts to pass.

Faculty: Teachers are average. They are qualified and knowledgeable. A few teachers don't have the ability to teach students, particularly to average students. Curriculum is relevant and makes students to be industry-ready. Exams are tough but can pass with our efforts. Pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Faculty members in our department are good. Most of faculty members are qualified and knowledgeable. Course curriculum is relevant. Semester exams are tough, making it difficult for the majority of students to even pass.

Faculty: Some teachers are good and some are bad. Some teachers don't know how to teach students effectively. Exams are very difficult, most students have more than 50% supplementary exams. The atmosphere for a better study is not provided. College faculty members are not much better.

Faculty: Teachers are not experienced and do not know how to teach students. They are not supportive. Semester exams are not good. They do not even study properly. Assignments are huge and there is no time to study. Pass percentages are low and it is about 15%.

Faculty: Faculty members are good. All of them have enough qualifications. Their teaching quality is understandable. They help students with their doubts without any hesitation. Course curriculum is relevant but it doesn't make students industry-ready.