MMMUT Gorakhpur Faculty Details & Reviews ,Gorakhpur

Faculty: The teachers are well educated and qualified, some of them are helpful, and some are not. The teaching quality is average. The course curriculum is relevant because, as a CSE student in the first year, I am studying Physics and Chemistry, which, in my opinion, will not contribute to my subject. The semester exams are not tough, all we need to do is solve PYQ's. The passing percentage is 40 percent overall, and you must also get more than 15 marks in 50 in semester end examination to pass.

Faculty: The teachers were helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality was good. The course curriculum was relevant. Students gained knowledge of problem solving and developing new things on an industry level. Semester exams were moderate. Around 90 percent of students passed.

Faculty: The faculty of the Civil Engineering department in MMMUT is quite experienced and supportive. Most of the professors have good academic backgrounds and a strong command of their subjects. They explain the concepts clearly, and if you approach them outside class, they usually guide you well. But as for semester exams, you have to depend on yourself, not on others. No one will cooperate, so struggle on your own make good relations with pros.

Faculty: The teachers of MMMUT are well-qualified and knowledgeable. They also help us every time we get stuck in any situation. The teaching quality they provided was also kind of good. They take regular lectures throughout the week. The course curriculum of IT is relevant. It includes Java, OOPs, Operating Systems, DAA, and Python, which helps us in future placements. It makes the students industry-ready. The semester exams in this college are not very tough. One can easily pass the exam by studying a ...

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. They have some experience in teaching. They are well educated. In reality, it is well structured, but you have to put a lot of hard work into studying, which makes you industry-oriented. The semester exam is a little bit based on the previous year's exam paper, questions are more from the PYQs only.

Faculty: Teachers are good, but ultimately you have to study on your own to get a good CGPA in exams. Although teachers are very helpful, if you ask them to guide you, they will help effortlessly. On your side, you also have to study and work hard for your exams.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, knowledgeable, and qualified. Some are Ph.D. scholars. Teaching is done on SMART board. Course curriculum aligns with the relevancy and provides real-life practical knowledge. Semester exams are average and based on individual prep.

Faculty: Faculty just come and teach what they have written in their notes, no explanation nothing. The curriculum is quite old and should be changed surely in the upcoming years. 3 SGPA is the passing criteria. There is also a branch change option in our college. You need to have 8 CGPA, and no backlog in 1st year for branch upgradation.

Faculty: Professors are quite helpful and knowledgeable. They use smart board technology. The course curriculum is also good as it covers everything from the basics and covers almost everything related to that topic. Studies are interesting and relevant.

Faculty: If we go to the faculty then the faculty members here are so good. There is a good interaction between faculty and students. Exams are conducted in a very fair manner. If cheating is caught, there will be discipline imposed on that student.

Faculty: Teachers here are helpful, qualified, and much knowledgeable. They take regular classes. Teaching quality they provide is also good. Nowadays, many teachers are also using smart boards and PPTs to explain everything. The course curriculum is also relevant, it will make you market ready. The semester exams are also not much difficult at this college. One can easily pass the exams if they are a little focused. The pass percentage is around 95 percent. One has to score 40 marks out of 100 to pass t...

Faculty: The faculty seem to be generally competent, especially for core branches. But, like many large government engineering institutes, variability between departments/teachers exists, so your experience may depend on your branch and which professors you get. For theory-based subjects, there are continuous evaluation (Minor test) 30 marks, tutorial, assignment, attendance 20 marks, and major examination 50 marks.

Faculty: Teachers are very qualified. Sometimes they are helpful, sometimes not. Generally they are helpful. Teaching quality is up to the mark. This course curriculum is very much relevant to coder world. It makes us industry-ready and employable. We have AIML in our course too. Semester exams are generally not very difficult. If you study for it, otherwise it will be difficult for you to pass. Pass percentage is very good, it's nearly 95 percent but 80 percent in Maths. As students find mathematics to ...

Faculty: The faculty and teachers are highly qualified and knowledgeable with good teaching methods. The curriculum here is highly up-to-date and relevant for students. The semester exams are kind of okay, with most of the students passing them easily. On average, academics are at a very good level.

Faculty: Faculty are very helpful in core branches, especially the Civil Branch, which is well qualified and very supportive. They help personally, too, with the preparation for GATE or other exams. Course Curriculum is fully relevant. The civil semester exams are a little tough, but they help a lot in our assessment.