GITAM School of Core Engineering Hyderabad Faculty Details & Reviews ,Patancheru

Faculty: Teachers and professors are more than qualified. They give you insight into the topic in such a way that you will understand it on your own. Every curriculum is relevant and can be used outside in the industry. You just have to know how to use what was taught to you in order to benefit from it.

Faculty: Excellent teaching. Internal examinations are easy, and for externals, there are 30 marks, to pass, we need a minimum of 10. The external exams are for 70 marks, with a minimum passing mark of 28. We can easily achieve this by completing quizzes and assignments.

Faculty: The professors are very helpful and friendly. They are top-notch. The teaching quality is excellent. The course curriculum has been designed keeping in mind industry standards. The semester exams are neither too hard nor too easy; they are rational. The pass percentage at any point in time is around 80%.

Faculty: The teaching quality in my college is good. All the staff and teachers are good at teaching and are qualified, knowledgeable, and experienced. There is no difficulty in writing semester exams, and the pass percentage in my college for this course is good, with more than 50%.

Faculty: Teachers in our college are well-educated, well-qualified, and well-trained. They all are very talented. Their quality of teaching is clearly understandable to everyone in the class. Our college curriculum was updated according to college management decisions. Semester exams are moderate.

Faculty: Teachers are very good. They are well-experienced, helpful, and qualified. The course curriculum is relevant to make students ready for the industry. Semester exams are not difficult. All topics are covered in our classrooms.

Faculty: Our college had the best faculty members. They were always available to guide us. They taught us relevant topics that were useful in the programming part. Semester exams were quite easy. The pass percentage was 40%. If we listen to and understand faculty members' lectures, exams will be easy.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified, but few of them don't have good knowledge. This course curriculum does not make students industry-ready. They do not teach anything related to the competitive market. The management does not focus on the growth of the students.

Faculty: The faculty is well trained and they teach us practically and theoretically. In my course, the students are trained to handle companies and many typical works and projects. The exams are good much better. Semester exams are conducted very strictly.

Faculty: Some of the professors are great but most of them are not. The curriculum is extremely dated and has little to no relevance to today's industry standards. A lot of the people who join GITAM, join the CSE programme. Over the course of 4 years I have realised that it is not that hard to pass exams and the system of continuous evaluation has been formulated so that you can pass with ease.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful a lot. They help us in many ways, and all the courses are almost related to core subjects. Semester exams will be conducted every 5 months twice a year. Semester exams will not be very tough, and we can easily get a good score.

Faculty: The faculty members are well-experienced and supportive. The curriculum is well designed and made comfortable for students to grasp the concepts easily. Assignments are given, and plagiarism is checked. Semester exam papers include conceptual questions and cases where there is no scope for mugging up.

Faculty: Teachers here are very helpful in every aspect. They try to provide the complete knowledge they possess and help students to achieve their goals. Their teaching quality is pretty good. The course curriculum was good. Our course provides knowledge in such a way that students can either opt for the software field or ECE field. Industry training is not very good on our campus. Semester exams are of a moderate level. About 70% of the students get passed in every semester's exams.

Faculty: Teaching was very good at this university. Many professors had done PhD in their respective fields. All the teaching faculty members were good, and they have good knowledge of their subject. They can explain anything related to that subject, and they have good communication skills. Their language proficiency was awesome.

Faculty: The teachers were helpful, qualified, friendly and knowledgeable, but I'm disappointed with the teaching quality as we were taught how to secure marks in exams but not practically. Because of this, many students are failing to achieve placements. The course curriculum is adequate enough and does make students industry-ready.