NMAM Institute of Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Mangalore

Faculty: All lecturers are highly qualified and teach very well. They make sure that everyone understands every concept clearly. The course curriculum is highly relevant to our branch, which makes us industry-ready. Semester exams are moderate and not very tough to crack.

Faculty: Teachers were student-friendly. The course was relevant and aligned with the academic curriculum. Semester exams were based on university-level and AICTE. There was always 100 percent pass percentage. If students grabbed the information provided by professors it's very easy to crack these exams. The professors highlighted each topic present in the subjects.

Faculty: Faculty members are very helpful, highly qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is excellent because professors are supportive. The course curriculum is relevant and successfully makes students industry-ready. Semester exams are quite easy to pass. Students only need 40 marks to pass a subject. The exam paper also includes 20 marks of MCQ questions, which makes scoring easier.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and knowledgeable. Teaching quality is above average. Teachers are highly qualified, as most are Ph.D. holders. The curriculum is relevant but outdated and can focus more on modern technologies like AI. Semester exams are easy in the first year but get harder after the second year. The pass percentage is 20% in internals (out of 50) and 20% in SEE (out of 100).

Faculty: The faculty members are very approachable and friendly. Every semester is divided into three internal exams, one end-semester exam, and lab exams if applicable. The internals are very easy and scoring, and they are for 20 marks. Two internals are given for 20 marks each, and another 10 marks are for the task. A minimum of 20 out of 50 must be obtained. If you fail to do so, they will provide another internal exam, where the marks will be rounded to 20 out of 50. The end-semester exam is for 100 ...

Faculty: The faculty of the department of biotechnology is highly helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, with most of the lecturers holding a Doctor of Philosophy degree. The curriculum may be just a bit outdated. But the research aspects are very much encouraged in the students from the beginning.

Faculty: They give good insights on technical fields with real-world examples. The course curriculum is very relevant as it covers all the requirements and necessities of the programme and it makes students industry-ready. The semester-end exam is average as it contains questions which are similar to those in the internal examination. The passing percentage is 40 percent.

Faculty: Everything is really well curated, and it’s so nicely put together that it’s easy for the students. All the circulars are according to the subject and well maintained. The exams are difficult, but the lecturers teach so good that they make the subject so easy.

Faculty: I would say the curriculum is very old; they need improvement in it. They need to include new things that are more relevant in the industry right now. About the teachers, they're very helpful and knowledgeable, except for a few, and the exams, they're very easy.

Faculty: The faculty members are very approachable and friendly. Every semester is divided into 3 internal exams, 1 end-semester exam, and lab exams if applicable. The internals are very easy and scoring, it's for 20 marks. 2 internals are given for 20 marks each, and another 10 marks are for the task. 20/50 must be obtained in this, if you fail to do so, they will provide you with another internal exam where the marks will be rounded to 20/50. The end-semester exam is for 100 marks, and a minimum of 40 ...

Faculty: Faculty in mechanical engineering are very experienced, with almost all the faculty members having 10+ years of experience. The course curriculum is affiliated with VTU but remains autonomous in its titles. The syllabus includes subjects that are not important to all the students. Moreover, no practical or application of the subject is implemented. But the concepts are thoroughly focused. The exams are conducted in a timely manner, in a time interval of 3 months or 6 months.

Faculty: Although the faculty was knowledgeable and helpful, some of them were overly theoretical. Although the curriculum was slow to adopt the newest technology, it was largely relevant to the industry. Exams were fairly challenging, with some challenging papers. The internal marking felt consistent, but the pass rate was about 85%.

Faculty: Faculty members often rely on reading from PPT presentations rather than helping students understand the material. The college does not adequately prepare us for the industry; internships are what build our confidence to handle work pressure. Exams are quite challenging in the electronics field.

Faculty: Teachers are really helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. You can ask them doubts anytime, and they are always free to help you. In my course, there is nothing related to the industry, so I don't know. Exams are really easy, and the passing percentage is nearly 35%, I guess.

Faculty: Most of the faculty members are good, but some are a little crazy type, they will shout without any reason. Even our Student Welfare Officer shouts at us without any solid reason. The exams for MSE and MSE 2 are mostly known by the teacher. Most of the time they provide important questions. For some exams, they provide important questions, but by using previous years' question papers, we can easily pass the exams.