NMAM Institute of Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Mangalore

Faculty: The faculty of the department of biotechnology is highly helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, with most of the lecturers holding a Doctor of Philosophy degree. The curriculum may be just a bit outdated. But the research aspects are very much encouraged in the students from the beginning.

Faculty: Everything is really well curated, and it’s so nicely put together that it’s easy for the students. All the circulars are according to the subject and well maintained. The exams are difficult, but the lecturers teach so good that they make the subject so easy.

Faculty: I would say the curriculum is very old; they need improvement in it. They need to include new things that are more relevant in the industry right now. About the teachers, they're very helpful and knowledgeable, except for a few, and the exams, they're very easy.

Faculty: The faculty members are very approachable and friendly. Every semester is divided into 3 internal exams, 1 end-semester exam, and lab exams if applicable. The internals are very easy and scoring, it's for 20 marks. 2 internals are given for 20 marks each, and another 10 marks are for the task. 20/50 must be obtained in this, if you fail to do so, they will provide you with another internal exam where the marks will be rounded to 20/50. The end-semester exam is for 100 marks, and a minimum of 40 ...

Faculty: Faculty in mechanical engineering are very experienced, with almost all the faculty members having 10+ years of experience. The course curriculum is affiliated with VTU but remains autonomous in its titles. The syllabus includes subjects that are not important to all the students. Moreover, no practical or application of the subject is implemented. But the concepts are thoroughly focused. The exams are conducted in a timely manner, in a time interval of 3 months or 6 months.

Faculty: Although the faculty was knowledgeable and helpful, some of them were overly theoretical. Although the curriculum was slow to adopt the newest technology, it was largely relevant to the industry. Exams were fairly challenging, with some challenging papers. The internal marking felt consistent, but the pass rate was about 85%.

Faculty: Faculty members often rely on reading from PPT presentations rather than helping students understand the material. The college does not adequately prepare us for the industry; internships are what build our confidence to handle work pressure. Exams are quite challenging in the electronics field.

Faculty: Teachers are really helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. You can ask them doubts anytime, and they are always free to help you. In my course, there is nothing related to the industry, so I don't know. Exams are really easy, and the passing percentage is nearly 35%, I guess.

Faculty: Most of the teachers are well qualified and have good knowledge of the subjects they handle. There are 2 MSE of 20 marks each an assignment of 10 marks and one final semester examination of 100 marks. The level of difficulty is moderate and almost all can manage to pass.

Faculty: The faculty here is well-qualified. They have really good knowledge about their subjects. The faculty members are experienced and speak very good English. They teach very well, making it easy for even NRIs to adjust to this place. They clear our doubts and are very humble.

Faculty: There is a highly qualified staff and they offer various electives subjects. There are a lot of technical clubs that help the students gain a deeper understanding of the subject and the course.

Faculty: Teaching is very good and helpful. They teach with good PPT and make students do projects on the basis of subject knowledge which is very best thing. Course curriculum is somewhat relevant to make students industry-ready but not completely, self-study is important.

Faculty: Professors are very helpful. Many faculty members are PhD holders. Teaching quality is also good. Their explanation is good. The course curriculum consists of subjects that are necessary for the industry. Semester exams are not so easy and not that difficult.

Faculty: Faculty members are good as they are well-qualified; most of them are Ph.D. holders or have completed their Master's. Their knowledge is very good. The courses make students industry-ready. Projects in each semester make students ready for the industry. Semester exams depend on the subject. Tough subjects’ papers will be tough, and others will be either tough or medium.

Faculty: Some teachers are good, but most of them are just not updated to the current trend. They still teach what they learned in the 90s. No hands-on learning in the curriculum, and if there’s a hands-on activity, none will be done by our faculty members. No, it doesn’t make us industry-ready, of course. Internals are pretty easy, but semester-end exams are pretty average. Most of them pass.