Raisoni Group of Institutions Faculty Details & Reviews ,Nagpur

Faculty: Faculty members are decently helpful but less qualified for the roles they handle. The management of exams is sometimes poor. Semester exams are easy to pass. While faculty members are supportive and guiding, they lack knowledge in some cases. Admission should be taken carefully.

Faculty: Teachers at G H Raisoni College, Jalgaon, are generally helpful, qualified, and supportive towards students. Most faculty members have good subject knowledge and guide students in academics, projects, and placements. Teaching quality is good, especially in practical subjects and laboratory sessions. Teachers also conduct seminars, presentations, and doubt-solving sessions for better understanding.

Faculty: I think faculty members are knowledgeable and qualified, but not well educated for teaching specific fields. The teaching quality is moderate. They only teach what is in the syllabus through PPTs and do not explain things practically. The course curriculum is very poor because they only teach theory and not industrial-level concepts. That is why many students do not get placed. The semester exams are easy, but the paper checking is very poor. The passing percentage is above average.

Faculty: The teachers are quite helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable in their subjects. They mostly use PPTs for teaching. There are different subjects as per the branch. They give you assignments, you need to give the class assessment exam, and end-semester exam. You can easily pass the exams with a good score if you read the provided material once or twice.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful. The course curriculum is relevant, and students gain basic industry knowledge and technical skills. The overall passing percentage is 80%. Teachers are more helpful to students, and teaching quality is good.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and support students in solving their problems. They help during practical sessions for understanding coding and debugging. Semester exams are not very difficult to clear. The passing criteria are moderate. For a 50-mark paper, around 15–20 marks are required to pass.

Faculty: Teaching subjects is done very rarely in class. We all did self-study only, with no notes provided to us. Our concepts are not clear at all, and that's why we are facing so many difficulties in placements, as there are very few companies. Other job opportunities are limited.

Faculty: Some teachers are helpful, some are not. All teachers are qualified and knowledgeable, but a few can deliver knowledge. The course curriculum is very relevant and satisfactory for students. Yes, the course curriculum makes students industry-ready. Easy and moderate-level difficulty is maintained in semester exams, and the pass percentage is based on a cutoff for a particular subject.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and qualified. But some teachers are rude because of their behaviour. Most of the teachers teach well and good, but some teachers can't teach us properly, and we can't understand what they are teaching. The course curriculum is relevant. It is a soft-core branch, and it makes students industry-ready. Semester exams are not too difficult in this college. To pass exams, one requires a passing mark based on the cut-off of every subject. In the DSA subject, out of 100 marks, we ...

Faculty: Teachers with technical as well as theoretical standards who can manage the students even in the hardest situations. Teachers with a centralised stance won't argue for the students or for the management. They focus on their work responsibilities and the related stuff. To get seats and it's unavoidable to write the qualification exam like the MAH MCA CET exam conducted by the college. The cutoff scores would vary from year to year to gain a seat one must work hard to grab it. There are no discuss...

Faculty: The faculty is well-educated and behaved. 10/10 for faculty. The curriculum is very good. Exams from this college are a little tough (personal opinion), but it is manageable because the college focuses more on making students industry-ready. The mid-sem exams are much easier compared to end-semester exams. 10% of students get detained or have a backlog in every semester here.

Faculty: Teachers were mostly qualified (M.Tech/PhD). Some were really helpful and explained concepts clearly and guided in projects. The syllabus covered standard CS topics (Programming, Algorithms, DSA, DBMS, and some AI/ML electives). Semester exams were moderately difficult, theory required understanding. Internals and externals were strict. Backlogs were rare if students studied regularly.

Faculty: Teachers are mostly helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, but the teaching quality is average. The curriculum is somewhat relevant but not fully industry-ready. Semester exams are moderately tough, and the pass percentage is around 70–75 percent. Some practical skills are taught, but more hands-on projects would help.

Faculty: Teaching is good. Teachers actually try to teach. Exams are also justifiable and come from the syllabus. There is no cheating in exams, and grading is good. Course subjects are relevant to their branch, and other course subjects are also added. Exams are normal not that hard, not that easy.

Faculty: Teachers at GHRCE are really helpful and supportive, and the teaching quality is quite good compared to other colleges in Nagpur. The course curriculum keeps updating as per the industry requirements, but this is not enough for students to survive in the industry. We need to do some coding courses on an online platform to gain real-world insights. The passing percentage is quite good. It's nearly above 85%, and the exam pattern is also as per the education standards.