Sanjeevan Engineering and Technology Institute (SETI, Panhala) Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kolhapur

Faculty: Teachers in our college are mixed. Some teachers are experienced, but some are new. Their teaching quality is average. Some teachers are knowledgeable and good for making students industry-ready. The course curriculum is outdated, in my opinion. There is more focus on completing syllabus than how many students learn from it.

Faculty: Teachers here are very helpful in case of academics. They will provide more information about the studies along with syllabus. Staff members are always ready to conduct activities related to the curriculum. They focus on covering the complete syllabus.

Faculty: All the faculty members of the electrical department have completed their post-graduation from autonomous institutes. They are good at their respective subjects. The teaching methods used and their knowledge about the subject are excellent. Five faculty members of the mechanical engineering department are qualified with PhD.

Faculty: Teachers are very supportive. They are very fuent in knowledge. They are really helpful in academic and also in practical point of view. The teaching quality is excellent. They were use both practical and Technical methods to communicate with us. The students to faculty ratio is too good. Teachers have good industrial experience.

Faculty: Teachers in Sanjeevan are well qualified. Teaching quality was quite practical as well as exam oriented. Site visited were conducted to improve the skills of individuals. Student-faculty ratio was 1:50. Practicality of the civil industry was very well realised to students. Overall the curriculum was very useful.

Faculty: Faculty required ME. Ph.D. qualifications to teach in college so every teach staff is ME. Ph.D. and experienced in their field. Availability of teaching staff is sufficient. Expert teaching faculty is appointed for different subjects. BE in automobile is available in college. There only two college have BE in automobile course in their college.

Faculty: The staff members are well-qualified and supportive nature of them helps the student to improve knowledge. The teaching quality is good. The teaching methods are chalk and board. There is an industry visit. They every time provide the practical knowledge. For every semester, there is a minimum of 4 industrial visits. The course curriculum is helpful.

Faculty: Technical and non-technical staff, both are very good and very helpful. Mostly, all the teachers have completed there ME on different subjects. Teaching quality is superb. We get industry exposure many times in Pune car plant. Different factors and mechanical fields are available.

Faculty: The faculty members are just okay, not that great, and even not that bad. They don't have any old experienced staff. From HOD to the staff, they keep making changes to it. The stable faculty was not there which leads to a bad impact on the student results. They need to get some well-experienced staff.

Faculty: As mentioned above, all facilities are present for students. Not on only paperwork, but the students from this campus are free to take advantage of these facilities. The staff teaching here are generally master's in their degree in the subject. They are very punctual towards students and help them out with their studies. There are branches like civil, mechanical, CSE, electrical, etc.

Faculty: Our college has the best staff in the entire Shivaji University. All the teachers are providing the practical knowledge, and MNC's exposure is also given to the students. Once in a month, one industry employee visited our college for the lecture which is very useful. Shivaji University's course curriculum is not as good as per the industry requirements.

Faculty: All the teachers are helpful and they are well qualified and good in knowledge. They teach with good quality. They use powerpoint presentations for teaching. We get industry exposure, and the student to faculty ratio is in between 12-15:1.

Faculty: The faculty team is good, experienced, very supportive and very helpful. Almost all of them are very qualified. All HODs are experienced and well-suited. Practical knowledge cannot be expected from all. Pretty normal teaching methods are used and nothing out of the ordinary can be expected. The faculty-student ratio is decent. Industry exposure is given. IVs and training are conducted according to the syllabus. The course curriculum was not that useful in actual industry conditions.

Faculty: Quality of teaching by teachers is good but not interested in engineers. Even we don't get proper solutions for our questions from the faculty. Faculty don't provide an industrial knowledge of outside of the country. The course curriculum is standard, which is only for completion purpose but not followed strictly.