BU Bhopal Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: The whole teaching staff consists of guest teachers. They are neither qualified nor do they care about the curriculum and syllabus; they start the semester with one topic, and somehow, the whole semester we are taught that. Quality really lacks in that regard. The course curriculum is relevant considering it falls under AICTE. You are not really industry-ready, but you can make that switch by yourself. The exams are easy, yet most of the crowd fails because they are not even willing to do it.

Faculty: Most faculty members lack industry exposure and focus solely on theoretical, surface-level teaching. The curriculum is outdated and does not prepare students for current market requirements. Semester exams are moderately difficult, but evaluation feels consistent. Students mostly rely on self-study to pass.

Faculty: Faculty members are so good. They all are helpful in every situation and every problem related to studies. Even if you are facing any personal problem they will help you in that also. Teachers are very helpful in studies they have very good subject knowledge. Their teaching techniques are very good. The course curriculum is relvant and makes students ready for industry. Semester exams are not difficult because our teachers are so good. The pass percentage is 92%.

Faculty: Teachers and faculty were very helpful. The teaching quality was good. They did not just teach bookish knowledge but also provided practical knowledge. There was also a Training and Placement Cell, which was the main focus of the college. It provided training to students for placements. Faculty was very friendly. They treated students like their own and focused on everything, not just studies.

Faculty: Faculty members are good. They reach class on time and give full time in class. They cover the full syllabus but they are not that up-to-date or qualified and do not have practical skills, so they lag there sometimes and their management capability is also not that good.

Faculty: Due to NEP 2020 14 (1), a lot of changes happened but due to cordial coordination of teachers and students, we were able to make it out eventually. Our batch was an experiential batch for this new education policy, due to which we also got the opportunity to explore multidisciplinary subjects.

Faculty: Teachers were very knowledgeable. They also seemed helpful and qualified, from top institutions. They probably made the students industry-ready. The semester exams were moderate and also thinking-based. The pass percentage was 70–80%.

Faculty: Only 1 percent of teachers are helpful. The rest do not have sufficient knowledge. They just read PPT and bullet points, and they are done. Notes are not provided properly for 2nd year, notes are made clearly from ChatGPT without personal knowledge. Most teachers don't even enter the class, mark the class free, and tell us to go to the library.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, but if you're not smart or regular, they might not be very useful to you. The teaching quality for Mathematics is 7.5/10, which is good according to me. The teachers are worth it. Chemistry is 6/10. They mostly just read from the book instead of actually teaching and give assignments to copy. There is no test-based CCE. The difficulty of the exams is moderate. If you study, you can definitely pass. I don't exactly know the pass percentage, but very few students have failed....

Faculty: Faculty members in our college are supportive and approachable. Curriculum includes both theory with practical learning. Exams are conducted to test concept understandin of studentsg. My mentor, Ms Sneha guided and supported me. Every teacher here is supportive and guiding. It is a great place to learn. We have case studies, projects, group activities, and individual assignments. All these provide hands-on learning and help develop communication skills.

Faculty: Teachers were not very knowledgeable. Some lab assistants were reportedly intoxicated during study hours. The examination conditions were also poor. After the college became autonomous, teachers were responsible for grading, which sometimes led to favouritism. Course curriculum was not very relevant. Teachers were sometimes unable to complete the syllabus on time.

Faculty: Faculty members are very well-trained and highly experienced. Most of the faculty members are Ph.D. holders and have 20–30 years of teaching experience. The course is completely related to the field. The semester exams are of a moderate level.

Faculty: The exams are always conducted late, and there is no clear idea of when the exams will start. The management system is poor. The academic head often informs students very late and is also not very aware of the system. There is an Academic Excellence Cell that is supposed to conduct academics properly, but it seems more focused on fining students.

Faculty: Sometimes teachers are helpful and knowledgeable, but the quality is not good enough to gain. Only course curriculum activities are done well, but not extracurricular activities. It doesn't make students ready for challenge competitions. Semester exams and results are delayed, and the degree is also.

Faculty: Most teachers are helpful, qualified, and have good subject knowledge. They explain concepts clearly, and they help students when they need help. They provide training and placement classes from day one to make students industry-ready. The difficulty of the exam is decent, but it depends on the student if he goes to college regularly, he can score well in the exam. The passing percentage is 22 percent out of 70.