CNLU Patna Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Faculty members are good at teaching. They give us good marks in all subjects.

Faculty: The college offers cooperative teachers and a student-friendly curriculum with less academic pressure on students. New and interesting courses have been introduced to keep up with the new age requirements (e.g., AI and law), along with traditional learning. There are new collaborations with other universities for different courses (e.g., SEL programme of ISB). Very nice academics.

Faculty: The quality of the professors varies, which can be a problem for students because the collaborative teaching system makes it difficult to keep up with all of them. The course moves at a fast pace, but it prepares students for the rigors that lie ahead. The difficulty level of the exams is quite good, with almost all questions being application-based.

Faculty: The faculty is helpful, qualified and knowledgeable. They try to impart as much knowledge as possible through their lectures. There are also guest lecturers. The course curriculum is carefully curated to meet contemporary needs and make the students industry-ready. The question papers are very tricky, as they not only test the bookish knowledge but also help the students prepare situation-based questions. The passing marks are 50% of the total marks and the passing percentage of students is n...

Faculty: The teachers are highly qualified and helpful. They are available in their chambers till 6 p.m., so anyone can approach them. But some teachers way of teaching is not good as they are not able to make students understand. The curriculum is very relevant as it teaches a variety of subjects along with practical skills like drafting and moot court. There are 2 exams in a semester: mid-semester and end-sem. Both are at an average level of difficulty, and students generally get good marks. Only 2-3% ...

Faculty: The teachers are helpful and knowledgeable. But there are some teachers who do not teach well and such teachers get replaced because they complain. There are two semesters in one year and the level of exams is average. To pass the exam, you have to get 50%, and it is not very difficult. 75% attendance is compulsory and there are 5 marks for attendance if you have 100% attendance.

Faculty: The teaching aspect needs a lot of work to be done. While there are some very good law faculty members, there are also some mediocre ones. The quality of teaching is overall average. The course curriculum is updated to the industry standard. The semester exams are moderate to easy. The current focus of our college is not on improving marks but on improving the required skills for the market.

Faculty: The professors are knowledgeable about their own topics and impart lectures in an easy and understandable way. The course curriculum is relevant and since the arrival of our new VC, Faizan Mustafa, there has been a great all-round development in academics. The semester exams test our knowledge and it is difficult, just like how law school should be.

Faculty: Faculty members are average; some of them are very nice, but some of them are not. The course curriculum is relevant and designed as per national law university standards. Semester exams are not that difficult. I feel they are easy. Yes, the curriculum makes students industry-ready and we get a 2-month internship break in each semester, which also provides good exposure. Teachers are helpful, and some of them are highly knowledgeable too. Teaching quality is average, I would say. There is a facu...

Faculty: The teaching quality is mixed in nature. Some teachers have an interesting way of teaching and the majority of them are well qualified. Yes, this course curriculum is relevant. This makes the student industry ready. The difficulty level of the semester exam depends on the teachers. They set the question paper in such a way that weak students can get passed; scoring high marks for toppers is difficult.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. A few professors are up to the mark. Their teaching style is up to the mark. Many professors are helpful and their teaching quality is good. Semester exams are moderate. The pass percentage is around 80-90%.

Faculty: The faculty members are not very helpful, nor do they have management skills when it comes to handling the class. But the exams are really tough, and the marking schemes are also very strict. There's only a handful of permanent faculty who do not help the college with its reputation.

Faculty: The teachers are well qualified and very helpful. You get to study in a nice atmosphere with a good curriculum to follow. Semester exams are pretty tough, but you will get through it if you study well. Overall, it's a great place to be.

Faculty: Faculty members are mixed in our college. Some are very good and knowledgeable and their mode of delivery is good. Others are poor with knowledge and have poorer delivery. However, we still lack good faculty in our college. This is the plight of almost all the colleges hence not a new for us to face.

Faculty: The faculty members are qualified, and a majority of them are very helpful. The university is running on a lack of faculty members (specialised). The teaching language is English, and the teaching quality is good. The course curriculum is now updated to make students industry-ready, till now, it was more towards Hons. papers. Now, new and diverse papers are included. Exams are tough. The faculty members do check for relevant content in answer sheets.