HNLU Raipur Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Teachers are beneficial and friendly in nature. Teachers are highly qualified and come from a strong background. The knowledge of the teachers is inspiring. Teaching quality is unique and they explain the concepts with real examples. The course is curriculum relevant and it makes the students industry-ready.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college are experienced and dedicated to providing quality education to students. Some of them encourage students to engage in legal research, moot court competitions, seminars, and workshops. The course curriculum is relevant, but students are not ready to face it because of the poor teaching of some faculty members. Semester exams are comprehensive so students have to study well.

Faculty: Our faculty members and curriculum were not good. Some faculty members put in a lot of effort to teach you. A large number of professors did the bare minimum to cover the course somehow. The selection of optional subjects and the scheduling of courses by semester were not what they should have been. The course curriculum was not designed in a way that would provide optimum benefit to students. The assessment method was very tiring and repetitive when it came to internal assessments.

Faculty: Faculty members are the best. If you concentrate in class, studying for one week before exams is enough. In HNLU, students have a habit of getting things molded according to their own preferences by way of protest and all. The university in itself isn't punctual regarding its work.

Faculty: Most of the teachers are posted as an assistant professor and associate professor. Most of the teachers are helping and well qualified. They very politely coordinate with the students in the classroom so that one can easily raise a question before them and hence the classes are always interactive. Here the LL. M. course is of one year which is further divided into 3 trimesters. So the students of LL. M. have to rush towards the library from very starting. 75% attendance is must, there is no oth...

Faculty: Faculty members of the college are well-qualified and hold decades of experience in their respective field of subject, and they use the conventional teaching method to teach. The course curriculum contains all the necessary subjects, and students undergo internships as well to understand the practical applicability of their theoretical knowledge.

Faculty: The faculty of the college is good and experienced but to be honest, it could be better, the teachers fail to give the lucid explanation to the students which results in a lot of confusion of various concepts and we end up studying all by ourselves with the help of google.

Faculty: Some teachers in our college are helpful, and their teaching skill is brilliant. But many are not ready as per me to take proper lectures. There are even fewer teachers than required in this college some teacher are taking 5 to 6 class because of the shortage of teachers. College doesn't make students ready overall for many fields. Students have to work upon themselves and go for their choices. However, Chhattisgarh Mantralay takes 13-14 students every year for a temporary basis of one year afte...

Faculty: The faculty members of HNLU are qualified and knowledgeable, they have in-depth knowledge of their respective subject but their teaching way is conventional. We have to undergo internships (in law firms) as a part of curriculum, which helps us understand the practical applicability of the theory subjects.

Faculty: The course curriculum is designed in a really nice manner and is almost at par with the better law colleges in the country. The college has helped me a lot during the internships. As far as the faculty members are concerned, all of them are qualified enough to teach the students. However, some teachers are good. Some are bad, and some are brilliant. Overall, the learning culture at the college is decent.

Faculty: Teachers are always helpful and motivators for guiding a student for his or her future career. They are all qualified as well as knowledgeable about their particular subjects and always explain a topic in a well manner. Students can also approach the teacher in their chambers after the classes if he or she has to learn a certain topic. Also, students can also ask for the extra classes if it deemed to be fit. There was about 50:1, student to faculty ratio and it may also be increased or decreased...

Faculty: The college has only two professors and out which one is the VC who's a non-teaching staff. The ad-hoc staff is more than the permanent staff. The quality of teachers has degraded when compared with its initial days. The course curriculum is decent. The college offers two honours subjects, but it could have been better if subjects like DPC would be taught in the initial semesters and not on the last year.

Faculty: The teachers were helpful. Some of them have completed their PhDs. They are specialised in their work field. The exposure is provided as they also deal with practical situations as well as the theoretical situations. The college also encourages the extracurricular activities.

Faculty: The faculty members who have joined the university are well-qualified and knowledgeable. They do their best to provide us with quality education. There is still a need to fill the vacant posts of professors and assistant professors, who are experts in their fields.

Faculty: Thr faculty is not up to the mark. Many teachers are ill experienced and they don't know abiut the proper methodology to teach. They have alnguage issues and are not fluent in english. The student-faculty ratio is good though. The curriculum needs to be changed and is not very good.