Kurukshetra University Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Teachers are above average, but some are boring and do not work properly. Only a few are excellent at their work. We have to struggle ourselves to get placed. The curriculum is relevant, but they do not make us industry-ready. They just provide theory. Their placement record is low. Exams are okay, and the pass percentage is 75%.

Faculty: Teachers are so helpful they have done their Master's and Ph.D. so they have a helping nature. Also, teachers are so friendly and cooperative with students because a teacher can guide a student which is totally visible in Geeta University and I am proud to be a part of it.

Faculty: Teachers are good, helpful, and knowledgeable. They explain things easily so that students can understand. I am in B.Tech CSE 2nd year, so I am a student who shows some interest, so teachers also support me. They even help to provide funds for a startup, so it is good, and the exams are set by KUK University.

Faculty: All the teachers are highly qualified and helpful in every problem faced by the students. Semester exams are also not very difficult all the syllabus is covered in the classes. The curriculum of this course is relevant, and they also provide all the material.

Faculty: Teachers are good. They are also qualified like almost everyone who has done PhD and specialisation in their respective domain. Semester exams are at a medium to difficult level. If you didn't study relevant like what the teacher taught in class it becomes difficult to pass.

Faculty: The teachers are qualified and knowledgeable but the problem is that they explain only 1 time. Some teachers are also rude and have some ego issues when approached. Teaching quality is average and sometimes they take extra classes to cover the syllabus. The curriculum is relevant but can include some practical and industry-focused learning. Semester exams are moderately difficult.

Faculty: Dr. Ankita was my favorite professor at PIET. She was an expert in AI and Machine Learning. Teaching methods were what I liked the most. She focused more on practical learning through seminars, workshops, technical quizzes, paper presentations, and conferences. In one year of the program, I attended more than 10 conferences based on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Other professors were also supportive. They helped with both academic and non-academic student problems.

Faculty: I was more into Cryptography. I wanted to become a pro in this domain. Ms. Sweety taught us Cryptography. She had years of academic experience, which was clearly shown in her teaching practices. Also, she was very supportive and encouraged us to work on live projects. Other professors were also good. The best part was that they all came from academic and industry backgrounds, through which we got practical insights about Cyber Security in a better way.

Faculty: Teachers are supportive and helpful. They are qualified for their posts. This course curriculum is relevant and makes students industry-ready. The starting semester is a bit hard, but the other semesters are easy.

Faculty: Teachers are quite helpful. They also tell students to study and send the important questions to our WhatsApp groups. The exams are divided into sessional, pre-university exams, and end-sememter university exams apart from the tests in the class. Most of the students pass our course.

Faculty: Some teachers are very helpful, not only with academics but also with innovation and student ideas. Exams can be quite challenging in certain situations. Students need both knowledge and the confidence to express their answers well to avoid backlogs. The courses are relevant and provide a good foundation, but advanced learning largely depends on the student's own efforts.

Faculty: Teachers are very good. They help students in everything, and teachers' qualifications are also good. The quality of teaching is also very good. If student get better marks they are industry ready. The exam level is moderate and the pass percentage is around 70 to 80 percent.

Faculty: Almost 50% of the time, the sports centre is closed. Some teachers are helpful, but most of them focus only on attendance rather than whether students are learning or not. In semester exams, some teachers tell questions that will come, while others do not.

Faculty: Faculty is one of the biggest strengths of the university. Faculty here is very supportive and highly approachable even after the lectures are over. Most of them are industry experts. Curriculum is updated every 6 months and is highly industry-oriented with a part of it overseen by industry experts themselves.

Faculty: All teachers are highly qualified, mostly Ph.D. holders, and very knowledgeable. They provide accurate information to students and focus on improving student knowledge. The course is based on business administration at the master’s level. Exams are conducted semester-wise. Results are based on CGPA and overall performance.