Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies - RK Valley (Idupulapaya) Campus Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kadapa

Faculty: Most faculty members are knowledgeable and supportive. Some teachers explain concepts very well. The curriculum is relevant and covers core subjects, but students must learn additional skills on their own to become industry-ready. Semester exams are moderately difficult, and the pass percentage is high.

Faculty: The teaching is good and really helps in semester exams. Semester exams are based on the syllabus covered by faculty, and doubts are clarified effectively. During exams, the college provides study hours to help students concentrate better.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful and provide extra materials and GATE test series for free of cost. It is related to chemical engineering. Exams are moderate, and 80% of students get pass percentage.

Faculty: Teachers are good, qualified, and knowledgeable. They will provide all the knowledge we need. There is good faculty. They support and encourage the students who have new, innovative, and creative thoughts. They will encourage them to implement those ideas. The curriculum is enough for a fresher to be in the top list of salary packages we have gone through sources. The difficulty level of the semester is cool. It's not that much difficult. We need to have internal marks, we have to work hard for ...

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They support students by clearly explaining doubts. The course curriculum is relevant and makes students industry ready. The difficulty level of semester examinations in the college is moderate.

Faculty: Our teachers are knowledgeable. Semester exams are somewhat difficult, but thorough preparation helps to clear the exams. The pass percentage of students is 90%. Communication between students and faculty is very good. They are clearing doubts and providing guidance for other exams, like competitive exams.

Faculty: Pass percentage is above 85%. Faculty is teaching well, they teach only on present situation in the technology development, and they conduct exams on these present situations only. Semester exams may be mostly related to developing technology and modern ideas.

Faculty: Most of the faculty are supportive. However, the visiting faculty (guest faculty) need to be more skilled. Especially in some of the core subjects, there is a lack of faculty. There definitely needs to be improvement in this issue. But the faculty here is very supportive of any creative decisions. The curriculum is industry-based, and semester exams are medium in difficulty. If a student studies decently, they will score good enough marks.

Faculty: Teaching facilities are very good, such as faculty management, food management, hostel management, etc. They are managed so effectively that this university still runs on a no-fee policy. They are allowing students from poor backgrounds to easily earn their degrees without any debt.

Faculty: Most ECE faculty members are qualified and strong in subjects like VLSI and DSP, though some focus too much on theory. The course curriculum covers industry-relevant areas but lacks hands-on training. Semester exams are moderately tough and strict. About 80% of students pass on the first attempt.

Faculty: Super faculty, they tell us about future plans also. Our facilities in college are very good, so our faculty teaches lessons with full clarity. They teach what we want to learn. Regular classes are held for BTech and other courses, so RGUKT is very good.

Faculty: Exams are conducted every month as mid-term exam. There are three mid-term exams in the semester and one final semester exam based on which the credits are given. Curriculum is simple as this is an autonomous college. Our college provides it's own curriculum, and faculty members are not bad.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and knowledgeable. I would rate the teaching 3.8 out of 5. The curriculum is good. The semester exams are really tough. The pass percentage is 35. The curriculum is good, sometimes they push us, but overall, it’s a good curriculum with good faculty members.

Faculty: There are fewer faculty members in my course, and some are low-level faculty. Our seniors had better faculty than we do. Sometimes, the lack of faculty requires sufficient education, which is somewhat poor. The quality of education is free, it may acceptable.

Faculty: We have qualified teachers. But they can't teach us based on their qualification as I know. Starting from the joining of college I have prepared self-study. Faculty also teaches well, but self-study makes us think and learn.