VIT Pune Faculty Details & Reviews ,Bibwewadi, Pune

Faculty: The faculty at Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, is highly qualified and supportive. Many professors hold Ph. D.s and have strong industrial experience, which helps bridge the gap between the theoretical concept and practical application. The exam structure is fair and well-balanced.

Faculty: VIT Pune's faculty comprises experienced professionals with industry expertise. Many faculty members hold PhDs or have significant industry experience. A favorable ratio ensures personalized attention and mentorship. Faculty members often collaborate with industry partners on research projects and consulting work. Faculty members publish research papers in reputable journals and conferences. They provide guidance on academic and professional matters. VIT Pune's faculty plays a crucial role in sh...

Faculty: Faculty members are really good and supportive and provide guidance but some are not good. The curriculum is good but students should also work hard and semester exams are of mid difficulty and reviews and presentations happen in college and math papers are conducted offline .

Faculty: The teachers are helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable, and most are approachable outside class too. The teaching quality is good, with a mix of theory and practical focus. The curriculum is regularly updated and verified by alumni working in top industries, so it is quite relevant and helps make students industry-ready. Semester exams are moderate, not very easy, but manageable with regular study. The pass percentage is high (above 90%), as the institute supports students with guidance and...

Faculty: Faculty, curriculum, and exams of our course are online mode in first year and 2nd year is offline mode that is why it is easy to pass 1st year. Faculty members are very happy and caring person about people so faculty members are very chill.

Faculty: Teachers may be knowledgeable, but they’re not helpful at all, though I think this is common in most degree colleges. Yes, the academic system here is great; they take you on industry visits abroad right in your first year, which can be a great addition to your CV. The price is a bit high, but it’s worth it to secure a good future. It’s not very difficult; the pass percentage is around 95%.

Faculty: In my course, out of 10, 8 teachers have knowledge and teach very well, and they helped us with the project. The course curriculum is one thing I appreciate about my college. Almost everyone can learn anything, as most of the subjects, including coding, are offered to every branch, including my branch. But not every subject is needed. Some are just waste and are not needed for industry work. Our exams are not that hard, and we can easily get 8 or 8.5 CGPA if we study well. Almost everyone passes...

Faculty: In the course curriculum, we cannot beat VIT every year as we get a different curriculum and different courses which are relevant to industry and current situations. All our faculty members are PhD holders. They have great teaching techniques, and we may find some faculty members too helpful for our careers. This course is designed in such a way that it is most relevant and can get us placed. Semester exams are not that difficult, and it is mediocre. Internals carry more marks than theory exams.

Faculty: Teachers are really helpful and knowledgeable; they will help you whenever necessary and when you need it. The course curriculum is especially good and has relevant topics for placements such as DSA, web development, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.

Faculty: Faculty is very qualified, but I think it is only for MAC ratings and not for teaching purposes. They do not know how to teach, and the exams are very bad and are conducted online. They do not fail anyone because they want to show that no student fails under their teaching.

Faculty: Semester exams for FY are comparatively easy as they are online, but they don’t carry enough weightage. It is more on projects, viva, attendance, and ASEP projects. Also, the intake is huge, so the teacher-student connection is not strong, and they don’t remember our names.

Faculty: Teachers at the college are very helpful, full of knowledge, and very eager to help. Their teaching quality is also good. The course they teach is very relevant for your mid-semester and end-semester exams and especially for your placements. The academic exams are held twice every year and are at an intermediate to hard level.

Faculty: The teachers are highly qualified. They explain every topic in detail through PPTs and lab sessions. We also have course projects to implement what we have learned in the subject, and the curriculum is designed such that it makes our resume unique and stands out from the rest of the engineering crowd.

Faculty: Teachers are excellent. Their teaching is so well-disciplined. The course curriculum is relevant, and it makes students industry-ready. There is a project-based learning. The pass percentage is 35%. Exams are conducted in a strict way. There is no chance of cheating. There are projects assigned to everyone.

Faculty: Faculty members of AIML are knowledgeable and supportive. They teach python, C Maths, and AI basics in the easy to understand way. The curriculum follows NEP guidelines and its industry aligns through more practical exploration like many projects could be added. Exams are conducted fairly and mostly check conceptual understanding internal assessments are sometimes rushed. But overall the academic involvement is encouraging.