Guru Jambheshwar University of Science And Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Hisar

Faculty: Faculty for my course is outdated. They claim to focus on practical learning, but they do not. The books, syllabus, and curriculum are based on outdated concepts. In my opinion, they do not teach the modern software that the industry demands. The course curriculum is outdated and not relevant to current industry standards. Teachers are good

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful towards students and help every student to achieve their maximum capacity and do well in exams, internal tests, etc. The course curriculum is relevant. It makes students industry-ready. 1st and 2nd semester are easy, but then the hard course starts.

Faculty: We have great teachers who really want to teach us with dedication. We have 7 faculty in the Mechanical department, 10 in CSE, 6 in CIVIL, and 8 in the Electrical department. This course curriculum is according to other universities. It is moderate to pass the exam. If you concentrate in class, you will easily pass the exam by studying for 1-3 weeks.

Faculty: Although there are many good and well-qualified teachers. For my course, they provide us with JRF scholars who don't know anything. Exams are a bit easy. One can pass easily if they do the PyQs only. The pass percentage is approximately 95 percent. I studied one night before the exam and got 82 percent, so anyone can pass easily. The course curriculum is not industry-relevant because in companies, they expect to work and not write definitions.

Faculty: GJU is famous for its faculty members. We have the famous professors who work with the government of India. Exams are easy if we attend classes, but if we do not, then get ready for a last-minute brain charge. We have open-book exams, but we still cannot beat professors.

Faculty: Teachers are hardly present in the remaining due to the students ' absence every single week, and they remain and force us to pay on time. The class includes various sections which involve a lot of technical topics, and the academics are likely complicated to pass. The professors are more oriented towards the everyday topics like the students. 

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified and knowledgeable. But the teaching quality is not that good. There is no scope for making students industry-ready. Semester exams are moderate. The pass percentage in my specific course is around 30-40%. Overall, you have to study yourself to get placements.

Faculty: Teachers are supportive for our course and understand the value of knowledge more than attendance and stuff. Professors are pretty knowledgeable and are qualified for teaching. As for the curriculum, it is relevant, and with continuous labs, they definitely make students industry-ready. According to me, semester exams are decent, mainly coming from PVQ and basics, but the level also increases sometimes. Required marks for passing are 28 out of 70, and for internal assessments, 12 out of 30 are r...

Faculty: Teachers are not that good, quality is not achieved by teachers, as they only teach the syllabus things, which are not properly understood by the students. Many times, the syllabus is not even completed. The course curriculum is good, but not completely taught by teachers, students have to do things on their own, like practical things. Exams are done fairly and in a good way, and most students pass the exams. I think more than 85% of students pass the exam for sure.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is also good. This course curriculum is relevant and makes the students industry-ready. Only the odd semester exams are a little bit difficult in this college, and the pass percentage depends on the subject.

Faculty: The course curriculum is relevant to real-world applications but needs to be updated from time to time. The course curriculum is to be more practical and in accordance with the Demands of recruiters. Thus, it doesn't make the students efficiently ready for the industry. Semester exams in college are not very difficult. It is moderately easy to pass.

Faculty: Some teachers are good and knowledgeable about their subject, but mostly do not teach properly. Students have to understand the topics on their own using the internet. The curriculum is also outdated, it won't help students in their placements. They have to study separately for it.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful. All teachers are qualified, and a maximum of teachers are PhD holders in their subject. The pass percentage in the semester exam is 60-70 percent. The course curriculum is relevant to us and very helpful. Semester exams are average, which is good, as students who have the ability can be promoted.

Faculty: The faculty of this college is pretty decent, like the same as you find everywhere, nothing special, nothing important. The curriculum is just the plain old one followed by most of the colleges in India and the exam pattern is what you can see on the college website.

Faculty: Teachers are almost PhD scholars and have good knowledge about their subjects. There are curricular activities that encourage us to do many activities. The exams in this university are moderate, not very hard, and almost half of the students in my class passed in all the subjects, and some got fails in 1 subject.