IIS Faculty Details & Reviews ,Jaipur

Faculty: The Psychology Department boasted a good faculty and experienced mentors. The course curriculum was relevant to the discipline and helped students gain a general understanding of various sub-subjects in Psychology. The examinations were held four times a year (two per semester). Each semester had a CA component of 30% and a Semester-End component of 70%.

Faculty: Teachers are well-qualified, supportive, and knowledgeable. Teaching is clear, practical, and interactive. The course curriculum is industry-relevant, covering tools like Python, R, and AI ML concepts, making students job-ready. Exams are moderately difficult but manageable. The pass percentage is generally high.

Faculty: Faculty members of the university are qualified and disciplined. Our university is also known for discipline. Most of the faculty members are from IITs and NITs. The teaching techniques are way better than other colleges, as per my friend's reviews. In every semester, the HOD tests students to see if the faculty members are good or not, or if there is any need for placements. So the academics of the campus are way better than others. The course curriculum is good, updated, and followed point by ...

Faculty: The curriculum was good and covered both the core theoretical concepts along with a good amount of practical exposure, including projects. Semester exams were moderate level in terms of difficult. Teachers were very good and helpful. The teaching quality was also good.

Faculty: The curriculum was relevant and covered key aspects of environment science, aiming to prepare students for industry roles. Semester exams were not that difficult. The passing rate was 90%. Teachers were very helpful and knowledgeable. The teaching quality was also good.

Faculty: Teacher's teaching quality was good. They tried to provide students with good mentorship and help. They were very approachable, knowledgeable, and had experience as well. The curriculum was good and nicely designed but was mostly theory-oriented focused.

Faculty: Semester exams were good. The difficulty was not that great, and the pass rate was high, around 90%. The curriculum was relevant and covered core microbiology concepts and related training. Teachers were highly qualified, and they provided a good learning environment.

Faculty: Teachers were generally supportive and knowledgeable. The curriculum was good and relevant. There were few lectures where practical projects were also included. Semester exams were medium-level in terms of difficulty. The pass rate was high, with around 8% of students passing.

Faculty: Teaching quality was good and was generally a mixture of lectures, lab sessions, and seminars. Teachers were very helpful and qualified. The curriculum covered core areas of chemistry. Semester exams were on a moderate level in terms of difficulty, and the pass rate was above 8%.

Faculty: The course curriculum was relevant and covered key aspects of environment science. Semester exams were moderate level in terms of difficult. The pass percentage was higher than 85%. Teachers were highly qualified, knowledgeable, and helpful.

Faculty: Semester exams were moderately difficult, with a pass rate above 8%. Faculty members were qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality was good but differ from professor to professor. The curriculum was relevant and covered core concepts.

Faculty: Teachers were good and knowledgeable, and they helped and guided students. The teaching quality was a blend of practical and theoretical knowledge. The semester exams were not difficult, and the passing rate was quite high, around 90%. The course was relevant, but the industry readiness factor could have been improved.

Faculty: The curriculum was good in terms of knowledge sharing, and the practical exposure was also beneficial in providing an understanding of how the industry worked. The semester exams were not very difficult, and the passing rate was high, with around 80% of students passing each semester.

Faculty: Semester exams are generally moderate level in terms of difficult, but the passing rate is generally higher than eight percent. The faculty is both knowledgeable and qualified. Teaching quality is also liked by students. The course curriculum is also relevant.

Faculty: Exams are good. Faculty members are the best part of ICG. All teachers are super cooperative. They solve all our doubts. They all are well-qualified and best suited for the subjects they teach. They give neutral evaluations and make sure we have good attendance in class. I found them very responsible and caring. Updating, of course, is uploaded to the college website. Different types of courses are available in this college. Extra courses are available in this college along with our course strea...