NFSU Gandhinagar Faculty Details & Reviews ,Gandhinagar

Faculty: One or two teachers were good. The curriculum was relevant, and the semester exams were moderately difficult. The passing percentage of students was around 50–60%, depending on the semester. Usually, odd semesters were harder than even semesters. This was what I realized.

Faculty: Lower priority is provided for written examinations. Most of the professors are retired officers from IB, CBI, and CFSL. To train the students with industrial practices, people from forensics are invited to take such modules for clear explanations. In the last semester, the project credits were huge. We are allowed to work on crime cases as our university comes under Maharashtra.

Faculty: The faculty members who taught us this programme were very cooperative and approachable. I was happy with the lesson delivery and the content. The faculty members explained even the toughest concepts easily. My Master's journey was fairly smooth because of the faculty members.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful, calm, and experienced in their respective fields. They are always ready to help me whenever I need. The teaching quality has been excellent throughout the years. The teachers always prepare us for the industries and provide us with all the practical knowledge necessary.

Faculty: Teachers in our course are very friendly, approachable, and helpful. They are well-qualified. All of them are Ph.D. holders. The syllabus is relevant to current environmental issues and is very contemporary. The semester exams are moderately tough, but all of my 15 batchmates pass successfully at the end.

Faculty: Faculty members are highly qualified and knowledgeable, with Ph.D. and research backgrounds. The course includes sustainability, environmental governance, environmental laws and legislation. Also, analytical techniques, and research-oriented learning. The exams are difficult. The passing criteria is a minimum of 50%.

Faculty: Faculty is good and very supportive. They are well related to career, and their teaching methods are also good. The course is really good and helpful for future aspects and has job opportunities. Semester exams are quite hectic but the level of difficulty is moderate. The passing percentage is 50 percent.

Faculty: The faculty members are knowledgeable and supportive. Most faculty members have a strong research background. They encourage students to participate in projects and internships. The curriculum covers both theoretical and practical aspects of environmental science.

Faculty: The pass percentage is 50%. Teachers are very helpful, but I miss old faculty members. New faculty members are also great, but I didn't get a chance to talk to them as I am busy with my project work of final semester. The exam section and its management are good, but some students faced issues related to getting bonafide. The course is very good.

Faculty: Teachers in my department are really helpful and kind. They are highly qualified. Their teaching quality is good. The course curriculum is relevant, and it makes us industry-ready. 50 percent is the pass percentage. Exams are held every month. It has some assessments and presentations.

Faculty: The course curriculum is good. Faculty members are also good. Exams are taken at time intervals. We will always be surrounded by exams. Faculty members are good, or at an average level. They don't create interest in subjects for us. They just do their work. They are just PhD holders from IIIT only.

Faculty: The faculty members are very supportive. Students can easily approach them with doubts even during off-duty times. Many have Ph.D. degrees from top law and forensic universities like NLU and are well-versed in their subjects. The curriculum is well-structured, evolving over time to meet field requirements, including core legal and forensic-specific subjects. Exams are not too tough if a student focuses in class.

Faculty: Teachers had clinical experience and were very helpful and qualified. The curriculum needed more industry partnerships, but it had a good balance of theory and practice. Case studies and exams were difficult. 80? 85% is the pass rate. Few professors placed an excessive amount of emphasis on memorization.

Faculty: The M.Sc. in Clinical Psychology included 4 semesters and covered major topics such as psychopathology and clinical assessment. Teachers had detailed knowledge about the subjects and were highly talented in conveying the related information.

Faculty: Faculty members are quite knowledgeable, and most of them hold Ph.D. degrees. The teaching style is easy to understand for all types of students. There are a total of 4 exams to be conducted in the whole course, which includes TA1, TA2, mid-sem, and end-sem. Students have to score 50% in exams to pass the semester.