RGPV Bhopal Faculty Details & Reviews ,Bhopal

Faculty: The teachers in our college are very talented and well-educated. The teachers are chosen from one out of 50 teachers. The teachers in our college are almost all Ph.D. holders and they are very clear about their subject. The curriculum is very relevant and it makes our students ready for industry and there are many expert lectures which help make our students better for industry.

Faculty: The teachers are qualified some of them have done their Ph.D. from IITs and NITs. The teachers are helpful some of them are good. The teaching quality of some faculty is good and some faculty is not as good. There is, as such no difficulty in passing the semester examination.

Faculty: Teachers in our college are well qualified. They are knowledgeable persons but sometimes they are not able to make things simple to understand. The college has a T&P cell which helps to make students industry-ready. Our college is affiliated with RGPV so it will be quite difficult to pass the exam without studying. 70 percent of students passed from my batch.It provides knowledge of programming, databases, software development, networking, and other technologies, which is the best part. Students...

Faculty: The college faculty is very helpful and they are well knowledgeable and their teaching is very impressive. The college follows the latest curriculum and also provides industrial exposure, and college examinations are moderate to hard in nature. College faculty is good in nature and gives future advice and clears all doubts.

Faculty: The college teachers are very helpful in nature. The teachers are graduates from top institutes, and the college curriculum follows the latest curriculum. The college semester exams are easy to moderate in nature. Around 60- 70 percent of students pass.

Faculty: Teachers were not very knowledgeable. Some lab assistants were reportedly intoxicated during study hours. The examination conditions were also poor. After the college became autonomous, teachers were responsible for grading, which sometimes led to favouritism. Course curriculum was not very relevant. Teachers were sometimes unable to complete the syllabus on time.

Faculty: Teachers are highly educated and well-known in terms of their legacy. Their teaching style is awesome. They understand their students very well. Students can contact any faculty member at any time for academic doubts or personal problems as well.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and generous. The teaching quality is good. All the materials are provided. The knowledge helps make students industry-ready. Faculty members are supportive and helpful. The academic curriculum gives students a good foundation in engineering subjects.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. Some have a B.Ed degree, and some have a PhD. No doubt about quality. 90 percent of teachers are of the best quality. The course curriculum is relevant, and the material and guide should build students to be industry-ready. The semester exams are not that difficult. Almost 85 percent of students passed in their semester exams.

Faculty: The faculty of Sri Aurobindo Institute of Technology are well-educated and very helpful. The way they teach is very understanding, and the teacher, HOD, and director sir are very helpful. If we do an event in our college, they give their percentage.

Faculty: Teachers and professors are all very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is great. The course curriculum is relevant and makes the students industry-ready. The semester exams are quite hard, but they are very competitive and good for students. The passing percentage is 33%.

Faculty: Faculty members are very well-trained and highly experienced. Most of the faculty members are Ph.D. holders and have 20–30 years of teaching experience. The course is completely related to the field. The semester exams are of a moderate level.

Faculty: The exams are always conducted late, and there is no clear idea of when the exams will start. The management system is poor. The academic head often informs students very late and is also not very aware of the system. There is an Academic Excellence Cell that is supposed to conduct academics properly, but it seems more focused on fining students.

Faculty: Teachers are good. They are also supportive, helpful, and encouraging. They also help you in the best way every time. The course is good for the IT industry. But here, you can't make the connections you really need to step into the industry. Also, the semester exams are not that difficult.

Faculty: Teachers were qualified, but not all of them. Practical teaching wasn't there. Teaching quality was not very practical. It doesn't make students industry-ready. Passing the semester was easy if you studied. However, there was no chance of cheating. The passing percentage was 60 percent. .