Atharva College of Engineering Faculty Details & Reviews ,Malad West, Mumbai

Faculty: In our college, teachers are very helpful, and they are equally qualified and knowledgeable. The quality of their teaching is good. This course curriculum is relevant, and yes, it makes students industry-ready for an industry-ready project. The difficulty level of exams is high.

Faculty: Faculty are really good they help the students a lot when the students need any help. They are friendly with the students. Many curriculum activities are happening in the college like fests and there are many departments for handling such activities.

Faculty: The teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, and the overall teaching quality is good. The curriculum is relevant to current industry needs and helps students build practical skills. Semester exams are moderate in difficulty, and the pass percentage remains around 85-90%.

Faculty: The faculty in my course is quite supportive and knowledgeable. Most teachers have good academic backgrounds and explain concepts clearly using practical examples. The curriculum is fairly relevant and covers the important subjects needed for industry exposure. Semester exams are moderately difficult but if you attend classes and study regularly passing is not an issue. The evaluation is fair, and internal assessment, practical, and viva-voce help students improve their scores.

Faculty: Teachers are so talented and knowledgeable. If any doubt occurs, they help out with the doubts, but some faculty members are rude, and some lab assistants are also rude. I hate some faculty members. They do make students industry-ready. Exams are not difficult. We don't study from the start of the semester, which is why our exams become difficult. In our college, there is a CGPA criterion, and it is so good, like 9.8 CGPA, 9 CGPA.

Faculty: Faculty members at Atharva College of Engineering are a mix of experienced and fresh professors. While a few are very helpful, qualified, and teach well. Others may just stick to the syllabus and slides. If we are self-motivated, we will do fine, but do not expect spoon-feeding. The good part is that some professors are approachable outside class and will guide us with projects or placements if we show interest. The teaching quality overall is average to above average. Some lectures are engaging...

Faculty: Most of the faculty members are qualified and helpful, though teaching quality varies from teacher to teacher. Some professors use PPTs and real-life examples, while others rely on textbook teaching. Curriculum follows Mumbai University and is slightly outdated. But there are efforts to include project-based learning and workshops. Exams are moderately difficult, and with regular study, students can score well. The average pass percentage is around 85-90%. There are also remedial lectures and no...

Faculty: Most faculty members are M.Tech or Ph.D. holders and are supportive, especially in CS and IT branches. However, some students feel the teaching style is more theoretical than practical. The syllabus is based on Mumbai University standards. While it covers fundamental concepts, additional certification or online courses are recommended to be industry-ready. The exams are moderately difficult. With consistent study, students can clear them easily. Pass percentage is generally around 80-90%.

Faculty: Teachers are not very helpful. They are qualified but not knowledgeable. Their teaching quality is not good, and students prefer YouTube over them. About 60% of the course is irrelevant, as it follows the old Mumbai University syllabus. It does not make students industry-ready. The exams are quite difficult. Teachers don't provide any important materials. The pass percentage is 70%.

Faculty: Faculty members are too good. Overall, the college provides a fulfilling environment for both teaching and research. It is a good place for educators who value academic freedom, collaboration, and student-centered learning. With the continued improvements, it has the potential to become one of the leading institutions in the region. Staff members are good.

Faculty: We had a good and supportive faculty. Some teachers could be easily approached, while others were more difficult due to their other duties as HOD and vice-principal. We had 5 subjects each semester, and these subjects were taught efficiently by our teachers. Even if, at that time, we had a doubt and couldn’t approach the teacher, we could directly meet them after the lectures for guidance, and they never said no to that. The exams were not that hard, so the maximum number of students passed the ...

Faculty: The staff is very helpful and qualified. The curriculum is relevant, but skills are based on your own exploration, so the course doesn't, but you yourself have to make us industry-ready. The semester exams are conducted by Mumbai University, so that's quite hard and well conducted, but the passing percentage is 35%.

Faculty: My department teachers are very helpful. They are well qualified and have good knowledge about what they teach. The course curriculum is mostly theoretical so most of the industry knowledge is not available. We have to gain industry knowledge from other sources. The semester exams are difficult but manageable.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable. The teaching quality is excellent. Our course curriculum is relevant and doesn't make students industry-ready. Semester exams are of intermediate level. If you focus from the first day of academics, then you will score easily 9 points in the semester.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. Their teaching style is also good. This course curriculum plays a vital role because it is a newly opened branch and has more potential to grow in the future. It makes industry-ready students. They are highly qualified professionals who taught us various subjects and methods to perform better in the curriculum.