College of Engineering, Adoor Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kerala - Other

Faculty: Faculty members are very good, most of them are M.Tech graduates and experienced. The college is under KTU University and follows the KTU curriculum. The curriculum is well structured and well organised. Semester exams are moderate level some are a little tough, but we can manage them.

Faculty: CEA teachers are experienced and supportive, blending theory with practical learning. The curriculum follows APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, updated with labs, projects, and industry-oriented subjects. Projects may come from small companies or previous alumni.

Faculty: Some teachers are excellent at teaching. The syllabus is based on KTU syllabus. KTU aims to prepare students for real-world challenges by interacting with practical projects and collaborations with industries. KTU APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University syllabus is generally considered to be quite tough. Many students report that it requires a significant amount of effort to achieve even a passing grade, due to its extensive coverage and demanding nature.

Faculty: Course curriculum is boring, they want us to study other subjects which don't give us a job like everyone in society calls us unemployed. It is not relevant. The pass percentage is very low not even half students passed. The exams are difficult due to intense exams, record with writing, assignment writing, etc.

Faculty: Faculty members have zero experience and zero ability to teach. Faculty members are missing their authority to decrease attendance and internal marks of students due to personal grudges. Course curriculum is so bad, that companies are avoiding this college for placements. Even companies know curriculum is useless.

Faculty: KTU syllabus is available in college of engineering. KTU syllabus is purely based on industry needs, technological advancements, and global trends. It provides regular updates, practical exposure, and skill-based learning to ensure graduates are employable, innovative, and prepared for future challenges in their respective fields.

Faculty: The curriculum is well-established. The course curriculum is relevant. Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. I think this course makes students ready for their industrial way. The exams are also difficult.

Faculty: Exams are very tough. I get half of the full marks, I don't think the course curriculum is relevant, it is still old model type of syllabus only some python and other subjects entered. Many students are failing in every exams even in series exams.

Faculty: I think that since the curriculum is new there are big advancements in our syllabus, which will ensure more jobs and others due to new syllabus. It makes the students ready for industry. But the exams are very difficult more and students are failing than passing. Teachers are really helpful in teaching between.

Faculty: The curriculum is of KTU. The KTU syllabus is tough, and it isn’t a normal exam that is given to you. The faculty is boring, they don’t teach you very well. Most of students who study this course are jobless now. I don’t know why people still study this course.

Faculty: Many of the teachers do not know how to teach. They are just speaking. They are qualified. We have good teachers who work and teach very well. The syllabus isn't good. You have to study other branch subjects. It is very tough. Exams are also tough.

Faculty: Some teachers are excellent but some are not good at teaching as it depends on teachers. The syllabus is made by KTU. The KTU follows an outcome-based education OBE system with a credit-based curriculum. The course curriculum also includes internships, mini-projects, and industry interactions to enhance practical knowledge. It also includes entrepreneurship classes for students to promote entrepreneurship. The course curriculum is relevant.

Faculty: Each teacher is well-qualified and has a good knowledge of each subject. They have good teaching qualities. The course curriculum is good and relevant. It makes students industry-ready. I got information from the seniors that semester exams are bad. The pass percentage is 40%.

Faculty: Almost all teachers were studied at IIT, CET. Vast knowledge in subjects, friendly and supportive behaviour, the course curriculum is very relevant and students are ready for industry. Semester exam is medium tough with question from whole section .

Faculty: Teachers are well educated, and helpful.