ADGITM Faculty Details & Reviews ,Shastri Park, Delhi

Faculty: Teachers in my college are quite good, very helpful, well-qualified, and supportive. Most of them are approachable. The problem starts with the curriculum. For example, we are learning C+ on some outdated software that feels like it straight from the 90s. It is slow, inefficient, and does not reflect the tools or environment used in the industry today. So while the intent is good, the execution is far from being industry-ready. The course content needs an update if they want students to be prepa...

Faculty: The course curriculum is relevant and good. Our college teachers are also good. They provide high-quality teaching. The college teachers solve any problems and errors in practical sessions. In this course, theory exams are not difficult, but practical exams are hard because lengthy code questions are given in exams.

Faculty: The teachers were qualified and knowledgeable. But there is a shortage of teachers in the college for 3rd and 4th year students. The course curriculum is mostly theoretical and doesn’t prepare us for real-world industry requirements. For that, students upskill themselves using YouTube videos or notes. The semester exams are quite easy if you are able to mug up most things. The pass percentage is usually around 80-90%.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, but they feel like they are not interested in teaching. Some teachers feel like primary teachers, and some just don't care about anything. Very few teachers are good in both education-wise and teaching-wise. Exams are being conducted perfectly in every aspect. Can't say whether the course is industry-ready or not, but they still include subjects that are irrelevant to industry in the first year.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified; also, the notes provided by teachers are very useful in sessions and midterms. The curriculum is course-related, and there are many workshops organized by the college that help too. Semester exams are good; I mean that if you study well throughout the semester, then the exams seem to be easy.

Faculty: Our teachers have varying teaching styles. Some are quite traditional and still use CMD for coding. The curriculum is primarily theoretical, with a strong emphasis on teaching concepts rather than practical coding skills. Important industry tools like SQL and excel are not part of our education. However, I appreciate that they have started to introduce machine learning, which is a positive development. Semester exams focus heavily on theory. Typically, passing is manageable, as most students onl...

Faculty: Professors are good with backgrounds. But only interested if we are interested in studying too. Basically, the course curriculum is relevant, but we have to upskill ourselves. Exams are moderate. Students should just take assignments and ask professors, and they will help us. If we also go through it, then it is helpful for us. Checking is also good.

Faculty: Teachers are good and friendly. They are highly qualified. Subjects are industry-ready, including DSA and Machine Learning. The semester examinations are difficult but easy to score with proper preparation. The passing percentage is 40%. Teachers assign good homework, and daily classes are conducted regularly.

Faculty: College faculty in the department is helpful, and most faculty members are qualified with a Ph.D. degree or a specific degree in their subjects. The course curriculum is mostly relevant, and the semester exams are hard. The passing percentage is 35% to 40%.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and supportive, also many have done Ph.D. Teaching quality is good for most of them but some are not. If we talk about course curriculum based which comes earlier times same curriculum. Semester exams are average if you study for 1 week you can easily score good marks because it is prepared by GGSIPU.

Faculty: Teachers are really helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, but at the same time, they sometimes get irritated with small assignments and rules, and regulations. Teaching quality is nice. But u have to maintain 75% of attendance. As I am in 1st year so I don't know much about the whole course. 1st year was kind of easy, no technical subjects. I got a 9.48 CGPA.

Faculty: Some faculty members are good, some are worse. Course are good, some faculty members provide you with study material that could be helpful for your mid-semester exams and end-semester exams. But this course won't make you industry-ready, you've to put your efforts to get placed.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They teach in a very good quality. They repeat if any student asks a doubt. It is not like other colleges in which teacher come, teach, and go back to their staff rooms. Here, teachers are very concerned about students. The course curriculum is relevant, but there are some subjects that we find so irrelevant. The semester exams in the college are of a good level, I don't think that there is some difficulty, but other students find it. I sc...

Faculty: Some teachers are good and helpful. The rest ones are rude. Internal exams are easy because teachers cover all the syllabus well, and give important questions for assignments from which questions are put in exams. On the other hand, university exams or external exams are decent.

Faculty: All teachers are great and helpful, even providing us with notes on the best skills to develop and what to do for the government exams they have given. In my opinion, the semester exams are moderate. The questions are tricky, but the answers are the same as what they taught us.