Institute of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Alwar

Faculty: The teachers are very bad over here. They just keep reading things without explaining anything. They, I guess, do not even have good degrees to be teachers but still they are. The examinations are conducted by Bikaner technical which is not able to conduct exams on schedule .

Faculty: First of all the faculty-student ratio is not optimal which is affecting the quality of teaching. The teachers are qualified but not knowledgeable. Yes, no issue with the course curriculum. Yes, it has the potential to make students industry ready. Difficulty level of semester exams is not too hard, any serious student is easily able to get good marks. So the average percentage of passing students is 60% to 70%.

Faculty: The teachers are very good. They are knowledgeable in this field. They are better than most of the colleges in Alwar. Relevant topics are mostly preferred, but I don't think the curriculum makes the students industry-ready.

Faculty: Faculty members of our college are good, well-qualified and some of the faculty members did their M.Tech from NIT colleges. They spend time with students on solving the problems. I am thankful to all faculty members who helped me out for building the basic concepts. The teaching quality is good, and they behave friendly with students. I am pursuing my B. Tech in electrical engineering branch, and the faculty of our department is excellent. They are always ready to make a bond with students. Facu...

Faculty: All the faculty members are highly qualified, and they are M.Tech degree holders. Their teaching quality is good. They provide more knowledge. The faculty members are helpful and cooperative with the students. All the faculty members clear the students' doubts carefully. They are frank with the students.

Faculty: The number of well-qualified teachers was low. Some teachers were teaching in the college alongside pursuing their master's degree. There were issues between the management and teachers. Attendance criterion was not implemented, so studies did not happen regularly. Basically, the faculty members avoid putting in efforts to teach students.

Faculty: Teachers in our college are very helpful, quailed and knowledgeable. All the teachers are M.Tech qualified and well experienced. All teachers have got very good teaching skills and are able to solve all our doubts. They are also always available to clarify the doubts of students.

Faculty: Around 2012 there were some big names in faculty for Mechanical engineering. They were well qualified, knowledgeable, experienced in there field. Some of them were helpful for students to set their goals by sharing there experience of industry and different fields. There were discussion in classrooms on the topics. But around 2015-16 all of them leave the college due to different reasons.

Faculty: The teachers are helpful and supportable. They try to provide practical knowledge. The teaching quality is good and provides good study material time to time. The course curriculum is useful for the students. Every lecturer tries to improve English skills for each student. In this college, some lecturers are very knowledgeable.

Faculty: The faculty members are bad. Only one or two are well-knowledgeable and highly qualified. Many of them are the seniors, who are doing M.Tech from the same college and teaching us. They are helpful. The teaching method is not good. Green board is present on which they use chalks to write. Many faculty members are seniors, so they don't know how to give a lecture. The course curriculum is useful. We don't get any industrial exposure.

Faculty: Teachers here are helpful, qualified and knowledgeable. But they are resigning slowly because of salary reasons as our college is drawing debt by the PNB Bank. Due to that 3 buildings of our college are seized by the bank. The course curriculum is 20 years old and could not make the students ready to get recruited by companies. Students could not get skill development in our college. So they have to take admission and indulge themselves in the skill development or personality development course ...

Faculty: The faculty and curriculum are best, and the teaching quality is also good. The teachers are helpful, qualified and knowledgeable. There is twenty-five student over a teacher. Thus it a good ratio. We also get industry exposures, and they make us industry visits.

Faculty: The faculty are well-educated and experienced. The teaching quality is excellent. The teaching methods use by the teacher as per syllabus of university overall it is good. The faculty ratio of per subject is 50:1. It is 4 year duration course to make success.

Faculty: I was in the mechanical branch, my faculty were good. I don't know about the other branches. Teachers were well qualified and good, but I did not get industry exposure. They are good in theory based learning, not in practical based. The student to faculty ratio was good enough. Teaching methods were conventional; nothing is new. They always asked to work hard in theory based exams, not in practicals.

Faculty: They are offering subject, but they don't have a great faculty for the course. They are offering so many of courses, but there are no proper faculty members for the courses. The faculty are not good. The only thing in this college is its students who have brave hearts to handle this kind of colleges.