KMCT College of Engineering Faculty Details & Reviews ,Kozhikode

Faculty: Faculty members are very friendly and we can ask how many doubts we want. However, the teaching style is not very efficient. The curriculum followed is of KTU 2024 scheme and is better than any curriculum before. Our college gives importance to academics very much so they will do anything for you to improve in academics.

Faculty: There are many departments in the college, with many staff who have enough knowledge in appropriate subjects. I have a mixed review about faculty members. Many staff are very helpful, others are not that much. Pass percentage of the college is comparatively low.

Faculty: The course has a great curriculum. Our college has good teachers with high knowledge. All of them are very helpful by providing notes, exam-oriented revisions, question papers discussions, etc. The curriculum is based on the KTU with good faculty members and syllabus.

Faculty: There are many departments in the college with many staffs those have much knowledge in appropriate subjects. Many staffs are very helpful and others are not that much. The pass percentage of the college is very low, but there is no need to worry about the pass percentage, the world is changing to a skills-oriented education, and KMTC provides that under student communities.

Faculty: The teaching quality is good. The course makes students industry-ready. Semester exams are good. I really don't know the pass percentage, but the highest CGPA is 9.1. Semester exams are comparatively difficult because this college follows KTU University norms, but it is good for me.

Faculty: Teaching faculty members here are good, and they try their level best to teach us what they have learned. Most of them are not qualified for this job because they lack in teaching ability. They are just telling what is in the textbook, and they don't make sure that we understand it.

Faculty: All teachers in the college are helpful, qualified and knowledgeable. The quality of teaching is good. They help students in all ways to improve their academic performances. The course curriculum was very much helpful to most of the students in this college.

Faculty: Faculty members are qualified and helpful, but the teaching quality varies. The ECE curriculum is KTU-based with decent labs and projects. However, self-study is key for industry readiness. Exams are moderate, and the pass rate is around 50%, with support from internal marks. Exams are passable for many students who stay focused.

Faculty: Teachers are not really experienced. But they help as they can. Teachers come to this college to get experienced. But they support students. College have low rank in university. The only department which have more students is computer Science and engineering. Other departments have less strength. Exams are okay. Pass percentage is 40 out of 100.

Faculty: Our teachers were excellent, supportive, and helpful. Semester exams were difficult. The teaching quality was good.

Faculty: Faculty members are not much good. They do not conduct classes properly. Their teaching methods are not good. Exams are very difficult. They are not bothered about students' careers.

Faculty: The college's staff had exceeded my expectations. They were all smart. They were always willing to assist students in any way they can. They were cooperative, which makes it easier for students to study because the student-teacher relationship was strong. Semester exams were merely symbolic and students were not under any exam pressure. This course was relevant for students' bright future. For employment students want a good education. The syllabus was not extra easy. It helps prepare for a know...

Faculty: Faculty members of our college are good with better qualifications. The course is good, but more internships are needed. I gained more knowledge on how to do work and how to study. Free internship, etc., are given. Teachers are the best-qualified from NIT, and many teachers help us at any time we want.

Faculty: Teachers in our department are generally helpful and well-qualified. Most of them have good subject knowledge. Teaching quality is decent, and doubts are addressed when students take the initiative. The course curriculum is relevant. It covers the important technical subjects, but becoming industry-ready still depends on extra practice in coding, projects, and internships. Semester exams are moderately difficult and mainly based on the university pattern. With regular study, passing is not very ...