Manipal Institute of Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: I think the curriculum is much better than what our seniors had, but still, there can be improvements in the curriculum, as we have certain courses that are not at all related to the stream we have chosen. Considering the changing world, our college changes its curriculum every 3-4 years. Faculty members are also very helpful and knowledgeable, with vast experience.

Faculty: In my civil department there was a good faculty to student ratio. I am not aware of other departments. All the staff were either Ph.D. holders or were trying to get one. Thorough knowledge. The interactions were very peaceful. We could ask them anything anytime. Always helpful. The course was very effective. The course was revised a year ago when I joined. It was up to date. It helps us to deal with real world so many things I learnt are resonating with my job now. There were exams every 2 month...

Faculty: Teachers are very friendly. No doubt they will help you a lot when you need them. You just have to be respectful, and boom, they are always ready to help you. The curriculum is mostly outdated, somewhat between industry-ready and not. To mention the exams, they are tough. They are really tough.

Faculty: Faculty members think from diverse perspectives because they are assigned a short period of time to cover the syllabus. Within such time, they ask us to write tests, teach lessons, and prepare students for examinations, which is usually a great deal for them.

Faculty: All instructions are given clearly, and we also get a trial chance to do everything, like answering a question or doing something in the lab. Student-to-teacher ratio is great, such that we can spend even 2 hours with them in their cabins. We also have multiple teachers in same subject, so we have an option to go to whichever teacher we like to solve our doubts. Whole syllabus is set in a way such that you need not go for extra coaching for GATE or other higher education entrance exams.

Faculty: Teachers are qualified enough, but not so knowledgeable. They always take help of books during teaching. Teaching quality is average. Some of the teachers and college staff are of a very unhelpful and rude nature. Curricular activities are only conducted at the start of semester.

Faculty: There is specialized faculty for every subject. Most of them have a Ph.D. or a minimum of a Master's in the subject they teach. The faculty is very much interested in helping students who are actually interested. Motivating and keen on students going into the research side and developing things rather than simply looking for jobs. The structure consists of a total of 100 marks per subject in a semester. The first sessional is 20 marks, the second sessional is 20 marks, and again, 5 assignment te...

Faculty: Faculty members are somewhat fine depending on your branch. Teachers in the CSE department are somewhat good. I don't know about other departments. Course curriculum now is pretty good initially when I was in the first year it was not that good but in the second year, students started teaching important things.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified and skillful at what they teach and help students individually if needed. Provide important materials and external sources to learn from. Course curriculum is designed to cater to the current world requirements and technologies. The sem exams are application-based and test your fundamentals of the subject.

Faculty: Most teachers are good and experienced, some are approachable. Most have PhDs. Course Curriculum is relevant and up to date. Credits are allotted based on the program, around 40-50 credits per year. Students are made industry-ready by the course and are exposed to much learning by student clubs and especially student projects like TMR, Formula Manipal, RoboManipal, MRM, ThrustMIT, and AeroMit to name a few. Semester exams in 1st year are the same for all, the ease of exams depends on your prep i...

Faculty: The professors were helpful qualified and knowledgeable in their own fields of study. Course curriculum was relevant. Students were become ready for industry jobs. Semester examination of the college was quite tough. The passing marks was 40 percent.

Faculty: Teachers are very knowledgeable and skilled. The teaching quality is very good. The course curriculum is relevant and many activities are conducted which makes students industry-ready. Semester exams are not so difficult if studied properly just before exams. Very few faculty members are present here.

Faculty: Most teachers are good, but there are some bad ones as well, as in any college. The course curriculum is the same for all first years. Honestly, it's not very relevant since everyone is made to study subjects like Biology, Chemistry, and EVS. But, some other subjects like electronics, electrical, and math are very much relevant for all students. There are two exams each semester, along with numerous quizzes and assignments. Semester exams are not too hard if you prepare 1-2 weeks in advance.

Faculty: Professors were helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. But, remember since we were master's students, it was important to make a good relationship with professors for project approval. The course curriculum was relevant, and students were make on many real-life projects. The semester examinations were a little hard.

Faculty: Exams are all conducted on an E-pad (like an iPad) to be more environmentally friendly, and exams are pretty competitive. All teachers have a Ph.D. and are well-trained. Exams are moderate to hard in terms of difficulty. Lab exams are also important.