Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Chembarambakkam, Chennai

Faculty: The teachers were well qualified and helpful enough to sharpen our knowledge. The teaching quality was very effective and useful. Yes, automobile engineering has good scope in the future, as the era of electric cars (EVs) has also begun. Semester exams have different difficulty levels depending on the subjects that we have. Analytical subjects like fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, finite element analysis, etc. are a bit difficult when compared to other theory subjects.

Faculty: The teachers are not that bad, they will clear your doubts when you approach them personally. There are a total of 2 Cycle tests and one model exam per semester. The passing of semester exams will be tough if you don't attend the classes, so do attend the classes.

Faculty: Teachers in our department are knowledgeable, qualified and they're helpful in various manners. The course curriculum is more relevant to the industry so that the students when they passed out they're industry-ready. Semester exam question papers are prepared by Anna University so the difficulty is variable and the conducting of exams is the prior duty of the exam cell in the college. The pass percentage generally falls between 60 to 70%.

Faculty: The curriculum structure is good and very useful. We can attain good knowledge. Faculty members who are teaching us are not that good to make every student understand every concept. They should focus more on guiding students to get more practical knowledge.

Faculty: Teachers here are very kind and helpful. They are well qualified and friendly in clearing doubts. This course curriculum is relevant. Our college is working on making students industry-ready by providing online as well as on campus-based training.

Faculty: As compared with other colleges, our college faculty members are very good and friendly. Their teaching methods are excellent, but the problem is there is not enough number of staff members for teaching. Other than the syllabus, the concentration is a bit less like IV, symposium, etc.

Faculty: 1. The teachers in our college are well qualified. In our course, the teachers has the great experience in teaching. They are nearly 5 to 10 years experience in work. And the teaching method is so understandable. 2. The course is relevant, because in future, mechanical engineer's are most important and this makes the student industry ready.

Faculty: Some faculty members are good at teaching, but some do not know the concept. They do not clarify our doubts in a few times. Faculty members are very useful in project and PPT. Students are not ready for the industry because of a few industrial visits.

Faculty: 1. Our faculty members are knowledgeable, qualified, helpful. Moreover teaching quality is good. 2. Yes our course curriculum is relevant and it makes the students ready for the industry.

Faculty: Teachers teaching are good and knowledgeable and they conduct cycle test and model exams and on the basis of teachers review. All the teachings are good. Yes, I am mechanical engineering and my course is relevant and average for industries and it can be corrected by internships.

Faculty: Teachers in my department are good hearted and knowledgeable teachers and they encourage us and make our knowledge to be better and they are very attentive to clear our doubts. Yes this course is relevant to industry but need more practical type practices to know more about companies procedures and to know more about automobile field works.

Faculty: Teachers are resourceful and spend a good amount of energy into settling the future of students. Extra classes and coaching are given for late bloomers. Internships and industrial training were provided. Startup cell is very strong here. They have 5 startups incubated inside the campus.

Faculty: Very few faculty members have good teaching skills and all the remaining faculty just read the syllabus and make the students give seminars in the class for half of the semester. They tell us to revise the portion, which they didn't teach. Students can't clear their exams because of this teaching.

Faculty: The faculty members are not qualified. They don't have much experience. They are not good in the subject knowledge. They avoid the class time and don't provide proper coaching, etc. The laboratory staffs have more knowledge than the senior staffs. They don't speak fluently in English.

Faculty: In our college, there are no senior and experienced professors. They are hiring only freshers with no experience. The teaching in biotechnology department is good, but the other departments like mechanical, automobile, ECE, and EEE are not good. I am in the third year, and my batch didn't get any industrial visits or not any educational tours also. They collecting book fees and industry visits fee, but didn't provide us. The course curriculum is okay.