Sri Venkateswara College Faculty Details & Reviews ,Dhaula Kuan

Faculty: Teachers are quite friendly and approachable. They use engaging teaching methods in the classroom. I think the curriculum is not up to modern-day skill requirements. But still, teacher support beyond the syllabus helps students in their careers. Semester exams are moderate.

Faculty: The faculty members have good domain knowledge and are helpful whenever needed, but the teaching pattern varies from one professor to another. The curriculum covers the basics well and is fairly relevant to industry requirements. Semester exams are of moderate difficult if you attend classes regularly and prepare from standard books and PYQs.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful and very serious about the subjects they teach, so there is very little chance of classes getting cancelled. It rarely happens. In terms of quality, I would give them a solid 9/10. The course curriculum is pretty theoretical. It needs more practical exposure, to be honest, as we are in the new age of AI, where we are supposed to rapidly learn and evolve ourselves to stay relevant. The semester exams are very easy. You need to do the PYQs, and you are good to go. It is very e...

Faculty: The teachers are helpful and well-knowledgeable. The curriculum is not so relevant as per the industry standards and definitely needs a lot of improvements. The end-semester examinations are moderately difficult but can be prepared through past year questions.

Faculty: Faculty members are knowledgeable about their subjects. They provide insights whenever needed. However, the course has many elements that, according to me, are unnecessary and burden both students and faculty, showing the drawbacks of NEP more than other factors. Exams are moderate, although the checking sometimes raises doubts, with a high pass percentage. The course provides knowledge but does not always make students industry-ready, often requiring additional qualifications.

Faculty: Some of the teachers are well-versed and teach well. Others, however, are not great at teaching. Overall, the teaching is just fine. The course curriculum is relevant but is not quite enough to make students industry-ready. It is less application-based and more focused on derivations, which should be the opposite. The semester exams are of moderate difficulty, with a high pass percentage.

Faculty: The teaching staff is mostly from South India, so they may have difficulty speaking fluent Hindi, and their English accent can be a bit confusing. However, they are not rude. Some of them are, but around 90% are helpful, while a few do not care much.

Faculty: I have had great interaction with the professors of my course. They are helpful throughout the course and are also available on either text messages or calls. The attitude and approach of all the teachers are adequate, which a student expects from their mentors. Talking about the semester exams, one needs to be through with previous years' question papers and have an adequate learning of their course and subjects. Delhi University colleges often follow past-year question trends, but also one nee...

Faculty: The teachers are very nice, helpful, and very approachable. They are quite qualified and knowledgeable, with years of experience, as it shows in their teaching skills and the way they conduct classes. The exams are of a moderate level and the pass percentage is quite good.

Faculty: Faculty is well qualified and dedicated, a few are helpful, and a few are not. It totally depends on the person-to-person. Faculty promotes not just curriculum work but also extracurricular activities as well for the students' good and they are pretty understanding of society work and internships too.

Faculty: Teachers are very experienced and respected, but their teaching methods are not up to date. Some teachers tend to use presentations and group discussions as a way to teach, but senior teachers prefer the blackboard style. The curriculum is also very theoretical, with a lot of practical flaws and does not make the student industry-ready. Semester exams are usually on the slightly harder side, but collective marking usually deals with it.

Faculty: The faculty had been nice. The teachers are surprisingly quite helpful and provide continuous guidance throughout the year. The curriculum is fair, and surely helps in future industry and corporate-related jobs. The exams are easy and one is ready to pass when one is prepared.

Faculty: Excellent faculty, especially in socio hons. Teaching quality is commendable and classes are made engaging by using reading and extra material. Semester exams are moderately difficult, preparing students for final exams. Overall the academic environment is good.

Faculty: Teachers in my course are not very helpful and give attention to only a small group of students. The curriculum is also not very good because the syllabus is basic and can easily be learned through YouTube. The semester exams for the program course are much easier than the honors course exams.

Faculty: Teachers are mostly helpful and qualified. The only issue is that there are many South Indian teachers, so there is sometimes a communication barrier because they do not understand Hindi. Their English is a little difficult to understand. The curriculum is mostly fine, but it is very theory-based. It can be more practical so that it helps us learn more about the real world.