IPEC Faculty Details & Reviews ,Ghaziabad

Faculty: Faculty members are highly qualified, approachable, and bring real-world experience to classrooms. The curriculum is industry-relevant, regularly updated, and promotes practical learning. Exams are well-organized and fair, with continuous assessment supporting consistent growth.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They also have good teaching quality. The curriculum is relevant and helps make students industry-ready. Teachers prepare students with industry-level knowledge. 40% marks are the passing percentage. It's easy to pass exams if you are an average student.

Faculty: Teacher changes during the semester, which is not good. When I was a fresher, there were a lot of professors and faculty members with more experience, but nowadays faculty does not have much experience. The college makes students industry-ready if students are also interested in doing the work. Teaching quality is average, but for development purposes, teachers are really good. Semester exams are set based on AKTU's previous year's papers and include a mix of previous questions and patterns. In ...

Faculty: This college hires good quality faculty members which helps students a lot and faculty conducts exams for good preparations for the end semester examination which gives better results. Inderprastha Engineering College (IPEC), Ghaziabad, follows the curriculum prescribed by Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University (AKTU). The faculty is a mix of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. IPEC conducts sessional exams (two per semester) and a pre-university test before the end-semester univer...

Faculty: Teachers are not helpful. AKTU has the worst academic calendar. We have to give 3 exams within a month because of the sudden release of the date sheet. There is no winter break because of late exams, just for 5 days. Course curriculum is difficult from rest of universities like IPU. Teachers are not supportive so attendance issues are there.

Faculty: Teachers was very knowledgeable, and helpful. They teach very well. They explain all concepts nicely and practically. The course curriculum is very relevant to me. It helps make students know about what is happening in the industry. Recent changes and technology that the industry is using in real life.

Faculty: It is all good. In our college, there is a sessional exam every month, which is very irritating for students. There are also two practical exams in one semester, which is boring for students, and four papers in one semester. 75% is mandatory, which is also boring. The semester exams are moderate, and we can all crack them in one week. Teachers are highly qualified and hardworking.

Faculty: It is also good. The course is average, and the teaching quality is also average. The semester exams are moderate and can be cracked with 1 week of study. Teachers are highly qualified and workaholics. The passing percentage is average for all, and it is not much minimum to case a dip in your academic. Faculty members are good. There is a teacher, Ms. Divya Mam, she is very educated and helps students with their studies. She makes studies easy.

Faculty: faculty members are good and very helpful, at least the teachers I have encountered. One Physics teacher, in particular, has been exceptionally supportive; she is highly qualified and teaches engagingly. She takes the time to explain concepts thoroughly and is willing to revisit topics for students who need extra help during her free time. While most of the faculty is good, I would say about 5% are not as effective.

Faculty: Teachers are nice and have a good knowledge of what they are teaching. The course curriculum is not relevant, and it does not make students industry-ready. Semester exams are difficult in our university. The pass percentage is 30%. We have to score 21 marks out of 70 to pass exams.

Faculty: Our faculty members are good and supportive. They also provide extra classes. You ask them your doubts any time on campus. They have a polite nature, especially some teachers are very polite and helpful. They always provide good guidance to us. They provide notes.

Faculty: Faculty members are very good, they can teach the topic again if you have doubts or you want to learn it again. They are very friendly and show students a good path. Although the semester exam pass rate is very low, it is due to our university internationally fails students for money.

Faculty: Faculty members are well-trained and experienced at college. The teaching quality is also good. They explain well and make students understand well. Course curriculum is very much relevant to students and helps them to get opportunities. Our college culture is great and the course is one of the finest courses ever and has good opportunities. The management is very caring towards students and is very good.

Faculty: The faculty is a mix. Some are knowledgeable, while others are not very effective. Support from teachers is limited, but they are approachable. Practical labs exist for coding subjects like C, Python, and Java, but most subjects are theoretical. Exams are manageable, but university evaluation is poor, with common errors of 10-15 marks. The curriculum is outdated and heavily focused on written learning, with no flexibility in subject selection. Internal assessments are frequent (every 1-2 weeks)....

Faculty: Faculty is not good, and even our principal, HOD, and director are not up to the mark. So far, only 1-2 industry visits have been conducted, and only a few students who were selected were taken. They have not even conducted any free trips or similar activities.