Faculty of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Faridabad

Faculty: Faculty members are well-experienced and supportive. Most professors hold post-graduate or doctoral degrees, and have many industrial exposures. Question papers are a fair mixture of theoretical and application-based problems, although a stronger emphasis on learning still persists in some subjects.

Faculty: Although the curriculum of our college needs a little bit of turning, overall because of the faculty of biotechnology and those amazing professors life at Manav Rachna is easy, exams and everything goes smoothly. Somewhat the curriculum makes the students industry-ready but you'll have to build yourself as well.

Faculty: Maximum faculty are well qualified and knowledgeable. They are also helpful if you have some genuine reason to not attend college, they even re-explain the topic sometimes if you genuinely want to study. There are 3 exams in one semester (2 midsems and one endsem). Midsems of 30 marks are extremely easy as maximum questions are from pre-given assignments, the endsem might be comparatively harder, but studying can fetch good marks.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, and all are assistant professors. They are somewhat knowledgeable but provide average teaching, so do not expect a lot; a few teachers are great. Don’t rely on the course curriculum, as it is cut short, and DSA is taught not practically but through rote learning. Nothing in the course will make you industry-ready. There are many exams; you will first take 2 sessionals within a one-month gap, a viva in between, and then a week of final viva and final exams. There is no time ...

Faculty: There’s a review of the faculty, curriculum, and exams for my course at Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies. The faculty members are experienced and highly qualified, with many holding Ph. D.s from top universities. Faculty members use a combination of traditional and modern teaching methods, including lectures, discussions, case studies, and project-based learning. Faculty members are approachable, supportive, and available to answer questions and provide guidance. The ...

Faculty: The teachers were helpful and knowledgeable about the subject they were teaching but the course curriculum was completely outdated. For engineering students, they taught C and C+ for 3 semesters straight and gave very little importance to javascript and python in the course. Whereas both javascript and python are the programming languages used in most IT/teach companies. So the course had very little relevance to the market demands. Passing percentage was 40 and we used to have exams at the end ...

Faculty: Teachers are all PhDs. They are well qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable. The percentage criteria to be eligible for exam is 75% attendance. That is something we have to be careful about. Otherwise it is not difficult to pass the semester exam exams.

Faculty: All teachers are Ph.D. graduates, and they are highly knowledgeable. Their teaching quality is very good. The course curriculum is very relevant; it makes us face the daily problems we encounter in life. We have very intellectual classes, and they have a very strict syllabus for every semester exam. The percentage of passed students is very high; almost 90% of students pass.

Faculty: Faculty members are worst. They are not helpful, but rude, and arrogant. They deliberately try to detain and fail students, so that they can earn money from PSC and reappear exam fees. PSC fees are very high i.e., Rs. 5,000 per subject, and reappear fee which is Rs. 2,000 per subject, which is not at all affordable.

Faculty: Faculty are very well-qualified. The teaching quality is average but not for all faculty. Some faculty teach very practically. The semester exam is very easy. There are two sessional exams and one end-semester exam. Just revise the assignment questions and previous year papers, and you can score better marks.

Faculty: Teachers were qualified with Ph.D. The course curriculum was designed specifically for the lower and average students. It's not difficult to pass the exams. Sometimes teachers did favors to pass the students with no backlogs. Attendance was 75% mandatory for everyone, but you can get grace with 65% of attendance.

Faculty: The faculty in my college are qualified and knowledgeable, and the teaching quality is good. We had no problems with the teaching quality. The exams are not too hard or too easy. My previous semester percentage was 80 marks out of 200.

Faculty: There is not a proper structure for the reappear and the detained exams which are very poor, and also the fees for the reappear are raised by four times the original price, which is very difficult for the students to pay. This is very unfair because they are essentially earning money by these practices. This is not acceptable; someone has to take part in this because they are taking ₹4000 per credit as a subject.

Faculty: Faculty here are good. They explain all concepts very clearly and regularly take smart classes. They know how to explain all concepts. Curriculum is also good. Exams are taken regularly like sessional 1, sessional 2 and end semester. Faculty takes care of all students so that concept get clear.

Faculty: The teachers are well qualified and experienced too; their behavior reflects their personalities, except a few teachers are a bit strict, but if you will listen to them, they are not going to charm you in any aspects. When it comes to the course, the real first reason to say this is that they do provide coding and language classes like C+ from the very first year and first semester itself, although there are no written exams for these, which are very useful. They start it with very real-life exa...