Faculty of Engineering and Technology Faculty Details & Reviews ,Faridabad

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable, and the teaching quality is also very good, the course makes students industry-ready, and the semester exams are a little bit harder, but if a student studies well, it's not that much difficult.

Faculty: Teachers are decent here. If you have any doubts, they will for sure help you, but only when they are free. Teachers are well-educated and qualified. The course curriculum is very relevant, and it makes the student industry-ready. Exams are hard to pass.

Faculty: The teachers were helpful and knowledgeable about the subject they were teaching but the course curriculum was completely outdated. For engineering students, they taught C and C+ for 3 semesters straight and gave very little importance to javascript and python in the course. Whereas both javascript and python are the programming languages used in most IT/teach companies. So the course had very little relevance to the market demands. Passing percentage was 40 and we used to have exams at the end ...

Faculty: Faculty members are helpful, well-qualified, knowledgeable, and quite experienced in teaching. Faculty members are quite supportive. The course curriculum is highly relevant, and makes students industry-ready by providing internship opportunities before placement.

Faculty: Faculty members are well-experienced and supportive. Most professors hold post-graduate or doctoral degrees, and have many industrial exposures. Question papers are a fair mixture of theoretical and application-based problems, although a stronger emphasis on learning still persists in some subjects.

Faculty: The faculty in my college are qualified and knowledgeable, and the teaching quality is good. We had no problems with the teaching quality. The exams are not too hard or too easy. My previous semester percentage was 80 marks out of 200.

Faculty: Teachers were beneficial and highly qualified to teach us. They completed the syllabus in the given time. The course curriculum was totally relevant and aligned with the industry, as industrial visits often took place. Semester exams were mildly challenging, requiring students to study to pass. There were sessional exams held twice, and the average marks of those two sessionals were added to the final result.

Faculty: Although the curriculum of our college needs a little bit of turning, overall because of the faculty of biotechnology and those amazing professors life at Manav Rachna is easy, exams and everything goes smoothly. Somewhat the curriculum makes the students industry-ready but you'll have to build yourself as well.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, and all are assistant professors. They are somewhat knowledgeable but provide average teaching, so do not expect a lot; a few teachers are great. Don’t rely on the course curriculum, as it is cut short, and DSA is taught not practically but through rote learning. Nothing in the course will make you industry-ready. There are many exams; you will first take 2 sessionals within a one-month gap, a viva in between, and then a week of final viva and final exams. There is no time ...

Faculty: There’s a review of the faculty, curriculum, and exams for my course at Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies. The faculty members are experienced and highly qualified, with many holding Ph. D.s from top universities. Faculty members use a combination of traditional and modern teaching methods, including lectures, discussions, case studies, and project-based learning. Faculty members are approachable, supportive, and available to answer questions and provide guidance. The ...

Faculty: Teachers are all PhDs. They are well qualified, helpful, and knowledgeable. The percentage criteria to be eligible for exam is 75% attendance. That is something we have to be careful about. Otherwise it is not difficult to pass the semester exam exams.

Faculty: All teachers are Ph.D. graduates, and they are highly knowledgeable. Their teaching quality is very good. The course curriculum is very relevant; it makes us face the daily problems we encounter in life. We have very intellectual classes, and they have a very strict syllabus for every semester exam. The percentage of passed students is very high; almost 90% of students pass.

Faculty: Faculty members are worst. They are not helpful, but rude, and arrogant. They deliberately try to detain and fail students, so that they can earn money from PSC and reappear exam fees. PSC fees are very high i.e., Rs. 5,000 per subject, and reappear fee which is Rs. 2,000 per subject, which is not at all affordable.

Faculty: Faculty are very well-qualified. The teaching quality is average but not for all faculty. Some faculty teach very practically. The semester exam is very easy. There are two sessional exams and one end-semester exam. Just revise the assignment questions and previous year papers, and you can score better marks.

Faculty: Teachers were qualified with Ph.D. The course curriculum was designed specifically for the lower and average students. It's not difficult to pass the exams. Sometimes teachers did favors to pass the students with no backlogs. Attendance was 75% mandatory for everyone, but you can get grace with 65% of attendance.