CMR University School of Legal Studies Faculty Details & Reviews ,Banasavadi, Bangalore

Faculty: All will be maintained with good structure and faculty members' interaction. Faculty members are decent not that best nor that good, except a few. Coming to exams the structure is 100 marks paper where you get 50 marks internal and 50 marks external. In external, 30 marks assignment and 20 marks test considering an average of 10 per test.

Faculty: Exams were great, and faculty was nice. The course teachers were qualified, and students were great friends. The coaching was nice, and exams were great.

Faculty: Teachers are knowledgeable; they teach well. The course curriculum is quite good. The exam schedule is not at all hectic; it's manageable and best. You can pass easily if you study. The passing percentage is also high; only if you study, it's easy.

Faculty: Professors were well-experienced. They helped us to learn difficult concepts by explaining them through case studies or live examples. They were very patient and ensured that our doubts were cleared. The design thinking and experiential learning pedagogical methods helped us innovate better in our field. The course curriculum included theoretical and practical components including classroom lectures, case studies, moot courts, and internships. Guest lecturers help us in all aspects. It also prep...

Faculty: Teachers are highly educated and friendly. They are well versed in the subjects and also help students by clearing their doubts. The course curriculum is up to date and relevant. Semester-end examinations are difficult but still, manageable because of the excellent teaching staff.

Faculty: The faculty members are highly qualified with good experience in the field of teaching and also in understanding the psychology of the students which provides good interaction between the students and the faculty members. The teaching methods differ as per the teacher, and also, the understanding level of the class is average. Our curriculum includes 5 compulsory internships for the students which instead give us field exposure.

Faculty: It was good Course curriculum was helpful, question paper setting was also okay; if you study getting percentage is also fine but sometimes students were being targeted and their marks was not provided as deserve. People were targeted many timesss.

Faculty: Faculty members in our college were good. Semester exams are not tough if students study well. Teaching was good sometimes, but students had to study on their own. Some of them were knowledgeable.

Faculty: Teachers were qualified and helpful. They always assist us for a better future. The course curriculum was not updated but the subjects were relevant to an extent. Semester exams were according to the level of the students, and the marking system was not lenient.

Faculty: The teachers are very knowledgeable. They are well educated and professionally qualified for their teaching and they teach very well. This course is very useful for students and it is very much needed for the students and they should learn a lot from this course.

Faculty: Teachers are really helpful. They will help in every aspect of research papers in various competitions. The teaching quality differs from teachers. A few teach well, and a few teach badly. Exams are held regularly on time. Most semester exams are easy only, so everyone can pass.

Faculty: Our teachers have been great so far, they are really helpful when needed. Now, related to the course, I think every student had to do their own research to avoid bias. Regarding exams, they're as usual, like any other college. I like one good thing if the practical exams are held, and most of them fail to do so, then the faculty conducts a re-exam.