AMU Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Faculty was experienced and supportive. Teachers explained concepts clearly and cleared doubts. The curriculum was updated, and industry-oriented topics were covered. Exams were a bit challenging, but if studied regularly, passing wasn't difficult.

Faculty: The curriculum is like that of other Indian engineering colleges. I can say it is good enough and far better than some private and almost every college of AKTU. I learned an interesting thing: if a student focuses on skills along with academics (no matter if average or good), the chances of being placed increase drastically. This year (2025-26), some Electronics and Automobile students are placed for teaching roles, as usual, every year.

Faculty: Teachers are very helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. They help the students focus on their studies, and they give appropriate answers to students who are confused about the syllabus. Teachers are accessible on WhatsApp, and we can contact them easily and ask any doubts.

Faculty: Teachers are helpful, qualified and knowledgeable. Teaching quality is also very good, they have great experience in teaching. A course is industry-relevant only if it integrates theoretical knowledge with the practical knowledge, such as the skills that the industry demands.

Faculty: Our teachers are well qualified with higher degree like PhD. Every teacher has good knowledge of our subjects. Our teachers are provided with doubt-solving. Our subjects are good for industry without any training. Our semester exam passing percentage is 75 %.

Faculty: Every teacher is highly qualified. Every single subject that is taught to us is very useful. Exams are set tough as the syllabus taught is also great. The papers question help us to get ready for industries and get a good job. Teachers help us in academic as well as other problem.

Faculty: I don’t think the teachers are that qualified and knowledgeable, their teaching style is good, but I don’t know why I don’t understand anything; I always have to study on my own. I don’t think the course curriculum is very good in the first year with respect to industry, because no college has followed the new education policy. For that, it is very difficult for us to study from the second year and get the same understanding.

Faculty: There is an AMU Entrance Exam. You can give this exam, and if you pass this, you can join the course. The exams are conducted by the university. Polytechnic faculty members are very good. They help every student in any case, and they all provide boats.

Faculty: Teachers are very knowledgeable and qualified, but whatever they taught in our class, I never got it. They are a little bit helpful, but not caring, because they are professors. There is strict attendance in our college. Most teachers are good at their subjects, but some classes are harder to follow. Our semester exams are tough, and they are held at the college examination center. Usually, about 82 to 85 percent of students pass.

Faculty: All teachers are highly qualified and very experienced. Teacher quality is intellectual to each faculty. Curriculum is relevant but for skill purposes, its not relevant. Students can be ready for industrial training. Semester exams are too easy to get good marks.

Faculty: The teachers are very good, but I don't understand what they teach me. I don't know about this because I am new to this field. The semester exams are very difficult. 80-85% of students pass the exam. One more thing is that labs have great hype because Viva is conducted in every class, and it carries 10 marks.

Faculty: Faculty in Mechanical Engineering at ZHCET, AMU are generally well-qualified (most hold M.Tech or Ph.D.) and approachable, offering guidance in labs, projects, and career planning, teaching quality is moderately good, combining lectures with practical sessions, though some classes still follow traditional methods, the curriculum aligns with core mechanical fundamentals and includes design, thermal, and CAD courses, with moderate exposure to industry software and internships, adequate, but could ...

Faculty: Faculty members are highly educated, but the students do not respect the faculty. Students most of the time bunk the class. Course syllabus is relevant. It is more than enough for industrial knowledge. Semester is too much easy because faculty members are supportive. 80% is pass percentage .

Faculty: Faculty is overall good and experienced. Teachers do put effort. Semester exam difficulty is moderate and not much hard if studied properly. Teaching quality is good and helpful. Overall, faculty is good and provides assistance. The course does make students industry ready.

Faculty: Classes are not bad, they are good. Teachers are qualified and experienced. All teachers take classes properly without frequent leaves. The curriculum of law is not that hard, but it is challenging at some level because we have more internal exams (4 exams, 1 assignment, and viva).