IIIT Bhubaneswar Faculty Details & Reviews ,

Faculty: Teachers, although very knowledgeable, don't know how to explain the clear-cut concepts of the subject. There are a few renowned teachers who teach extremely well and make the subject interesting and understandable. The course becomes relevant after the first year (First-year subjects were just unnecessary, except for computer-based ones). The semester exams are quite easy to handle if we start studying a day or two before.

Faculty: Top-quality faculty members are there, but some teachers are very strict, as you all know, someone is always there at any college. Apart from that, teachers are very helpful and will make your journey smoother. From the 2nd year, teachers are extremely knowledgeable.

Faculty: Some of the faculty members were good but some were average. Teachers were qualified and helpful for sure but lacked a bit of quality teaching and engaging students well. Course curriculum for my batch was quite irrelevant for the first 2 years, and students had to purely rely on self-efforts to be industry-ready. Semester exams had a good standard of question papers, prepared well, and you passed. But few subjects might be a bit difficult. Pass percentage was usually 98-100% but for difficult s...

Faculty: Semester exams are simply cool and everyone can easily attempt them if they attend their classes regularly. Course curriculum for every branch is simply decent and also includes every subject of the semester with respect to their credit. Overall fee may be a bit high.

Faculty: The curriculum is very old, no new things are taught. The things that are taught now have no use in the future or in our personal growth that can ensure a good experience for the future. The teaching method is very bad. Faculty members are less. Faculty members are easily approachable and a good relationship can be established. Some faculty members are good but the rest don't teach properly. There are four exams two quizzes one mid-sem and end-sem. Some portions of curriculum are relevant wherea...

Faculty: Faculty members are good. Exam papers are checked strictly. CGPA is evaluated relatively. It is not absolute like other colleges. Many students fail. Some even carry up to 10 back in till 3rd year. College courses are a bit old-fashioned but events organized by the college societies are great.

Faculty: Teaching quality is good. Most faculty members are highly qualified. They have done their PhD from top colleges like IITs and NITs. The course curriculum is very relevant and it is very useful for the students to become industry-ready. Semester exams are quite difficult and some exams are moderate. Faculty members are highly qualified and the academics are very good.

Faculty: Some teachers are helpful but some of them are not that helpful. Some teachers teach very well and also help with good guidance. Course curriculum is relevant. It does not make students industry-ready. Semester exams are average but some teachers make the papers hard. Overall, it's average.

Faculty: Some teachers are helpful, well-qualified, and knowledgeable, but some are rude and arrogant. The course curriculum is old, and it doesn't make us industry-ready as the subjects taught are not helpful for the future. The difficulty of the semester exams is average.

Faculty: All teachers are PhD qualified. They are all knowledgeable but we should do our own to get the best productivity. Courses have their own curriculum and and are fully subject oriented. Course curriculum makes the students industry-ready. Semestar exams are quite hard.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified and knowledgeable. Semester exams are of next level. Because of their helpful nature, we can solve the problems. Pass percentage is maintained but the average marks get lowered in some specific subjects like programming, mechanicals, and Maths.

Faculty: Teachers are highly qualified degree holders from renowned colleges in India like IIT. Teaching quality is average. Course curriculum is very recent and also relevant. At the end of fourth year course makes students industry industry-ready. Semester exams are moderate enough.

Faculty: Faculty members are helpful, qualified, and knowledgeable. Teaching quality is average because, last semester, there was a shortage of teachers, and Ph.D. students taught us. Curriculum is very old. Semester exams are easy, and not very tough, but there is competition for CGPA.

Faculty: Faculty members are decent; some are good, some are bad, but average experience is good. The curriculum is almost the same as other colleges, so there's no difference in that. The exams are a little tough here, and the exam environment is very strict and disciplined.

Faculty: The teachers are generally not helpful, although they are quite qualified and knowledgeable but they can't or maybe don't want to transmit the information to us. In my opinion, the teachers are below average but it is also undeniable that few teachers are great, whether they are Ph.D. scholars. The curriculum is relevant if you want to be a software engineer, developed or computer scientist in the 2000s. The academic pressure is high, guidance is negligible, most mentors don't respond, and senio...